Controlling the Game: Political Sponsors and Bureaus
dc.contributor.author | Bagnoli, Mark | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | McKee, Michael | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-11-14T23:21:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-11-14T23:21:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1987-05 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | MichU DeptE CenREST W87-14 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | D730 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | C720 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/100787 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, we intend to reexamine the foundations of the received theory of bureau behavior. We will provide arguments that suggest the political sponsor is not exploited by the bureau's application of its monopoly power. Instead, we argue that the sponsor may foster competition within or among the bureaus he controls thereby mitigating the bureau's monopoly power. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Center for Research on Economic and Social Theory, Department of Economics, University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | CREST Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject | Public Sector Bureaus | en_US |
dc.subject | Monopoly Power | en_US |
dc.subject | Niskanen | en_US |
dc.subject | Political Sponsor | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Bureaucracy | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Administrative Processes in Public Organizations | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Corruption | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Noncooperative Games | en_US |
dc.title | Controlling the Game: Political Sponsors and Bureaus | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/100787/1/ECON024.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Economics, Department of - Working Papers Series |
Files in this item
-
Economics, Department of - Working Papers Series
Working papers from the Department of Economics
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.