Perspectives on Countervailing Duties
dc.contributor.author | Jackson, John H. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-11-14T23:21:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-11-14T23:21:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1990 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | MichU DeptE ResSIE D269 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | F130 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | K330 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/100790 | |
dc.description.abstract | This comment primarily reflects its author's reactions to the article"A Search for Economic and Financial Principles in the Administration of U.S. countervailing Duty Law" by Professor Richard Diamond. However, to some extent it also addresses a 1989 work by the principal author, and a paper by Goetx, Granet and Schwartz, to which Professor Diamond's 1989 replies. While this comment will raise some fundamental objections to the central theses of the article, it also demonstrates an admiration for the analysis undertaken. That analysis, perhaps modified, can substantially contribute to the national and international debate on this subject. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Research Seminar in International Economics, Department of Economics, University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Seminar Discussion Paper | en_US |
dc.subject | International Trade | en_US |
dc.subject | Economic Growth | en_US |
dc.subject.other | International Law | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Trade Policy, International Trade Organizations | en_US |
dc.subject.other | U.S. | en_US |
dc.title | Perspectives on Countervailing Duties | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/100790/1/ECON251.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Economics, Department of - Working Papers Series |
Files in this item
-
Economics, Department of - Working Papers Series
Working papers from the Department of Economics
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.