How Robust are Sign and Rank Order Tests of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Theorem?
dc.contributor.author | Kohler, Wilhelm K. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-11-14T23:21:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-11-14T23:21:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1991-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | MichU DeptE ResSIE D212 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | F110 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/100819 | |
dc.description.abstract | The present paper will concentrate on four different rank order and two different sign propositions of the HOV model, which have, at various times, all been the subject of empirical analysis in the literature, and it will establish conditions, under which a given data set will support one (rank order or sign) hypothesis while at the same time rejecting another. This will shed some light on the circumstances influencing the likelihood of such non-robust test results. The paper will also examine the empirical relevance of this phenomenon of non-robustness using the multi-country data set published in Bowen et al. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Research Seminar in International Economics, Department of Economics, University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Seminar Discussion Paper | en_US |
dc.subject | HOV Theorem | en_US |
dc.subject | Rank Order Tests | en_US |
dc.subject | Sign Hypothesis | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Neoclassical Models of Trade | en_US |
dc.title | How Robust are Sign and Rank Order Tests of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Theorem? | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/100819/1/ECON278.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Economics, Department of - Working Papers Series |
Files in this item
-
Economics, Department of - Working Papers Series
Working papers from the Department of Economics
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.