Show simple item record

Cooperation Among Egoists in Prisoner's Dilemma and Chicken Games

dc.contributor.authorLipman, Barton L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-14T23:21:39Z
dc.date.available2013-11-14T23:21:39Z
dc.date.issued1985-05en_US
dc.identifier.otherMichU DeptE CenREST RSQE D69en_US
dc.identifier.otherC730en_US
dc.identifier.otherC720en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/100866
dc.description.abstractAxelrod has developed an evolutionary approach to the study of repeated games and applied that approach to the Prisoners' Dilemma. We apply this approach, with some modifications in the treatment of clustering, to a game that has the Prisoners' Dilemma and Chicken as special cases, to analyze how the evolution of cooperation differs in the two games. We find that the main barrier to the evolution of cooperation in Chicken is that cooperation may not always be correctly thought of as socially optimal, but that strong forces do push the players toward socially optimal action. We derive some of the results on mixed populations for any game with pairwise interaction.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCenter for Research on Economic and Social Theory, Research Seminar in Quantitative Economics, Department of Economics, University of Michiganen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion Paperen_US
dc.subjectGame Theoryen_US
dc.subjectPrisoner's Dilemmaen_US
dc.subjectChicken Gameen_US
dc.subject.otherStochastic and Dynamic Gamesen_US
dc.subject.otherEvolutionary Gamesen_US
dc.subject.otherRepeated Gamesen_US
dc.subject.otherNoncooperative Gamesen_US
dc.titleCooperation Among Egoists in Prisoner's Dilemma and Chicken Gamesen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/100866/1/ECON319.pdf
dc.owningcollnameEconomics, Department of - Working Papers Series


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.