Show simple item record

Pastures of Plenty: When is the Standard Analysis of Common Property Extraction Under Free Access Incorrect?

dc.contributor.authorSalant, Stephen W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNegri, Donald H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-14T23:22:12Z
dc.date.available2013-11-14T23:22:12Z
dc.date.issued1987-07-10en_US
dc.identifier.otherMichU DeptE CenREST W87-31en_US
dc.identifier.otherQ210en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/100938
dc.description.abstractThere are two ways to calculate the dynamic path of aggregate extraction when there is free access to a common property resource: (1) calculate the rent-dissipating aggregate extraction in any period (as a function of the stock) and then derive the dynamic path using the transition equation and initial condition or (2) examine the path of aggregate extraction in a subgame perfect equilibrium as the number of players expands without bound. The latter approach is theoretically correct but often intractable. The former approach, which has been widely used for more than thirty years, is tractable and generally presumed to yield the identical aggregate extraction path. We show by example that this presumption is erroneous. We then provide conditions which suffice for the traditional approach to be correct.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCenter for Research on Economic and Social Theory, Department of Economics, University of Michiganen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCREST Working Paperen_US
dc.subjectCommon Propertyen_US
dc.subjectFree Accessen_US
dc.subjectNash Equilibriumen_US
dc.subjectRent Dissipationen_US
dc.subjectSubgame Perfect Equilibriumen_US
dc.subject.otherRenewable Resources and Conservation: Demand and Supply (The Commons)en_US
dc.titlePastures of Plenty: When is the Standard Analysis of Common Property Extraction Under Free Access Incorrect?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/100938/1/ECON385.pdf
dc.owningcollnameEconomics, Department of - Working Papers Series


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.