Show simple item record

Slotting Allowances and Resale Price Maintenance: A Comparison of Facilitating Practices

dc.contributor.authorShaffer, Gregen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-14T23:22:18Z
dc.date.available2013-11-14T23:22:18Z
dc.date.issued1989-11en_US
dc.identifier.otherMichU DeptE CenREST W90-6en_US
dc.identifier.otherL810en_US
dc.identifier.otherD140en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/100956
dc.description.abstractProducers in a perfectly competitive industry compete to obtain shelf space at the retail level. Barring contract observability problems, slotting allowances are observed in equilibrium. Producers charge a high wholesale price, but give back their profits via up-front payments to retailers. However, if the individual supplier-retailer wholesale price terms are unobservable by competitors, then resale price maintenance will be seen, but the coverage will not be universal. The equilibria can be ranked by the usual social welfare criteria. Resale price maintenance, though worse than simple marginal cost wholesale pricing, yields greater surplus than the slotting allowance equilibrium.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCenter for Research on Economic and Social Theory, Department of Economics, University of Michiganen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCREST Working Paperen_US
dc.subjectRetail Shelf Spaceen_US
dc.subjectWholesale Priceen_US
dc.subjectSlotting Allowanceen_US
dc.subject.otherRetail and Wholesale Tradeen_US
dc.subject.otherE-Commerceen_US
dc.subject.otherPersonal Financeen_US
dc.titleSlotting Allowances and Resale Price Maintenance: A Comparison of Facilitating Practicesen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/100956/1/ECON400.pdf
dc.owningcollnameEconomics, Department of - Working Papers Series


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.