Show simple item record

Sequential Provision of Public Goods

dc.contributor.authorVarian, Hal R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-14T23:22:40Z
dc.date.available2013-11-14T23:22:40Z
dc.date.issued1990-01-17en_US
dc.identifier.otherMichU DeptE CenREST W90-2en_US
dc.identifier.otherH410en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/101035
dc.description.abstractI consider the private provision of public goods when agents are able to make sequential contributions rather than simultaneous contributions. In the case of two agents with quasilinear utility, a quite complete analysis is possible. If the agent who likes the public good least gets to move first, the amount of the public good supplied will be the same as in the Nash equilibrium, but if the agent who likes the public good most moves first, less of the public good may be supplied. If the agents bid for the right to move first, the agent who values the public good least will always outbid the other agent. In general, each agent would prefer to subsidize the other agent's contributions. If each agent chooses the rate at which they subsidize the other agent, the subsidizes that support the Lindahl allocation are the unique equilibrium subsidies. For general utility functions, I show that the subgame perfect quilibrium always results in less of the public good being supplied than does the Nash equilibrium.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCenter for Research on Economic and Social Theory, Department of Economics, University of Michiganen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCREST Working Paperen_US
dc.subjectPublic Goodsen_US
dc.subjectSequential Gamesen_US
dc.subjectStackelberg Equilibraiumen_US
dc.subjectNash Equilibariuen_US
dc.subjectMen_US
dc.subject.otherPublic Goodsen_US
dc.titleSequential Provision of Public Goodsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/101035/1/ECON472.pdf
dc.owningcollnameEconomics, Department of - Working Papers Series


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.