Show simple item record

Counting Groves-Ledyard Equilibria via Degree Theory

dc.contributor.authorBergstrom, Theodore C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSimon, Carl P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTitus, Charles J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-14T23:23:06Z
dc.date.available2013-11-14T23:23:06Z
dc.date.issued1983-10en_US
dc.identifier.otherMichU DeptE CenREST RSQE D49en_US
dc.identifier.otherH410en_US
dc.identifier.otherD310en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/101114
dc.description.abstractWe study the Groves-Ledyard mechanism for determining optimal amounts of public goods in economies whose agents have the most general class of preferences for which a Pareto amount of public goods can be computed independently of income distribution. We use degree theory on affine spaces to show that the number of equilibria in such economies grows exponentially as the number of agents in the economy increases. The large number of equilibria in such simple economic models raises doubts as to whether the Groves-Ledyard mechanism is a workable solution to the Free Rider Problem since individuals may have incentives to falsify their preferences in order to drive the adjustment process to a preferred Nash equilibrium.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCenter for Research on Economic and Social Theory, Research Seminar in Quantitative Economics, Department of Economics, University of Michiganen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion Paperen_US
dc.subjectGroves-Ledyarden_US
dc.subjectDegree Theoryen_US
dc.subjectFree Rider Problemen_US
dc.subject.otherPublic Goodsen_US
dc.subject.otherPersonal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributionsen_US
dc.titleCounting Groves-Ledyard Equilibria via Degree Theoryen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/101114/1/ECON097.pdf
dc.owningcollnameEconomics, Department of - Working Papers Series


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.