View Item 

Show simple item record

The CARE Guidelines: Consensus‐Based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development
dc.contributor.authorGagnier, Joel J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKienle, Gunveren_US
dc.contributor.authorAltman, Douglas G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMoher, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorSox, Harolden_US
dc.contributor.authorRiley, Daviden_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-04T18:58:14Z
dc.date.available2015-01-05T13:54:44Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationGagnier, Joel J.; Kienle, Gunver; Altman, Douglas G.; Moher, David; Sox, Harold; Riley, David (2013). "The CARE Guidelines: Consensus‐Based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development." Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain (10): 1541-1547.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0017-8748en_US
dc.identifier.issn1526-4610en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/101880
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherCase Reporten_US
dc.subject.otherHealth Research Reporting Guidelineen_US
dc.subject.otherMeaningful Useen_US
dc.subject.otherPatient Reporten_US
dc.subject.otherEQUATOR Networken_US
dc.subject.otherCase Studyen_US
dc.titleThe CARE Guidelines: Consensus‐Based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Developmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/101880/1/head12246.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/head.12246en_US
dc.identifier.sourceHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Painen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTully MP, Cantrill JA. Exploring the domains of appropriateness of drug therapy using the nominal group technique. Pharm World Sci. 2002; 24: 128 ‐ 131.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJenicek M. Clinical Case Reporting in Evidence‐Based Medicine, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiley D. Case reports in the era of clinical trials. Global Adv Health Med. 2013; 2: 10 ‐ 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference“Case reports” search results. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=case+reports. Bethesda, MD; PubMed, US National Library of Medicine; 2013. Accessed June 10, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaszkin‐Bettag M, Hildebrandt W. Case report on cancer therapies: The urgent need to improve the reporting quality. Global Adv Health Med. 2012; 1: 8 ‐ 10. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2012.1.2.002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKljakovic M. Single cases in general practice and general medical journals. Aust Fam Physician. 2002; 31: 669 ‐ 673.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichason TP, Paulson SM, Lowenstein SR, Heard KJ. Case reports describing treatments in the emergency medicine literature: Missing and misleading information. BMC Emerg Med. 2009; 9: 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152: 726 ‐ 732.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevon Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007; 335: 806 ‐ 808.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6: e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D. Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review. Syst Rev. 2012; 1: 1 ‐ 60. doi: 10.1186/2046‐4053‐1‐60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKelly WN, Arellano FM, Barnes J, et al. Guidelines for submitting adverse event reports for publication. Drug Saf. 2007; 30: 367 ‐ 373.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med. 2010; 7: e1000217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.100217.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams PL, Webb C. The Delphi technique: A methodological discussion. J Adv Nurs. 1994; 19: 180 ‐ 186.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomas B. Using nominal group technique to identify researchable problems. J Nurs Educ. 1983; 22: 335 ‐ 337.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorton JN. Nominal group technique: A method of decision‐making by committee. Anaesthesia. 1980; 35: 11 ‐ 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCalvert M, Blazeby J, Altman DG, Revicki DA, Moher D, Brundage MD, CONSORT PRO Group. Reporting of patient‐reported outcomes in randomized trials: The CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA. 2013; 309: 814 ‐ 822.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandenbroucke JP. In defense of case reports and case series. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 134: 330 ‐ 334.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJournal of Medical Case Reports. http://www.jmedicalcasereports.com/. Accessed June 17, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCases Database. http://www.casesdatabase.com/. Accessed June 17, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, et al. CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2008; 5: e20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050020.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHopewell S, Ravaud P, Baron G, Boutron I. Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: Interrupted time series analysis. BMJ. 2012; 344: e4178. doi: 10.1136/mj.e4178.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHirst A, Altman DG. Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e35621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035621.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHill AB. The environment and disease: Association or causation? Proc R Soc Med. 1965; 58: 295 ‐ 300.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKiene H, Hamre H, Kienle G. In support of clinical case reports: A system of causality assessment. Global Adv Health Med. 2013; 2: 76 ‐ 87. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2012.061.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHauben M, Aronson JK. Gold standards in pharmaco‐vigilance: The use of definitive anecdotal reports of adverse drug reactions as pure gold and high‐grade ore. Drug Saf. 2007; 30: 645 ‐ 655.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandenbroucke JP. Thalidomide: An unanticipated adverse effect. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation. http://www.jameslindlibrary.org/illustrating/articles/thalidomide‐an‐unanticipated‐adverse‐effect. Accessed January 10, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevy M. Propranolol for infantile hemangiomas. Global Adv Health Med. 2012; 1: 14 ‐ 16. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2012.1.2.004.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
head12246.pdf
Size:
61.19KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.