Show simple item record

Comparison of two rivers i northern Michigan for determination of differential effects of development.

dc.contributor.authorDillon, Jeff
dc.coverage.spatialCarp River - Emmet Co.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialLittle Black Riveren_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-05T15:07:04Z
dc.date.available2013-12-05T15:07:04Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/101886
dc.descriptionRivers, Lakes & Wetlandsen_US
dc.description.abstractTwo rivers in Northern Michigan, one with and one without watershed development, were chosen for comparison of several health and diversity indicators. A bioassay was used to determine nutrient limitation, and sampling was conducted of water chemistry, riverbed habitat type and macroinvertebrate community. Nitrogen and phosphorous co-limitation was found in the more developed watershed, while nitrogen limitation was found in the undeveloped watershed. Macroinvertebrates were found to have a lower EPT index in the more developed watershed. The data revealed key confounding factors related to underlying geology, but a correlation between watershed development and measurable river effects was determined.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleComparison of two rivers i northern Michigan for determination of differential effects of development.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environment
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/101886/1/Dillon_Jeff_2013.PDF
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.