View Item 

Show simple item record

Genomic evidence for elevated mutation rates in highly expressed genes

dc.contributor.authorPark, Chungooen_US
dc.contributor.authorQian, Wenfengen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jianzhien_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-08T20:34:24Z
dc.date.available2014-01-08T20:34:24Z
dc.date.issued2012-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationPark, Chungoo; Qian, Wenfeng; Zhang, Jianzhi (2012). "Genomic evidence for elevated mutation rates in highly expressed genes." EMBO reports 13(12): 1123-1129. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102069>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1469-221Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1469-3178en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102069
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherYeasten_US
dc.subject.otherHumanen_US
dc.subject.otherTranscriptionen_US
dc.subject.otherGene Expressionen_US
dc.subject.otherMutation Rateen_US
dc.titleGenomic evidence for elevated mutation rates in highly expressed genesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid23146897en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102069/1/embr2012165.reviewer_comments.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102069/2/embr2012165-sup-0001.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102069/3/embr2012165.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/embor.2012.165en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEMBO reportsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePleasance ED et al ( 2010 ) A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome. Nature 463: 191 – 196en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoede C, Denamur E, Tenaillon O ( 2006 ) Selection acts on DNA secondary structures to decrease transcriptional mutagenesis. PLoS Genet 2: e176en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBartel DP ( 2004 ) MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116: 281 – 297en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFilipowicz W, Bhattacharyya SN, Sonenberg N ( 2008 ) Mechanisms of post‐transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight? Nat Rev Genet 9: 102 – 114en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDrinnenberg IA, Weinberg DE, Xie KT, Mower JP, Wolfe KH, Fink GR, Bartel DP ( 2009 ) RNAi in budding yeast. Science 326: 544 – 550en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee W et al ( 2010 ) The mutation spectrum revealed by paired genome sequences from a lung cancer patient. Nature 465: 473 – 477en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePleasance ED et al ( 2010 ) A small‐cell lung cancer genome with complex signatures of tobacco exposure. Nature 463: 184 – 190en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAraten DJ, Golde DW, Zhang RH, Thaler HT, Gargiulo L, Notaro R, Luzzatto L ( 2005 ) A quantitative measurement of the human somatic mutation rate. Cancer Res 65: 8111 – 8117en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhang J, He X ( 2005 ) Significant impact of protein dispensability on the instantaneous rate of protein evolution. Mol Biol Evol 22: 1147 – 1155en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKimura M ( 1967 ) On the evolutionary adjustment of spontaneous mutation rates. Genet Res 9: 23 – 34en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhang J ( 2000 ) Protein‐length distributions for the three domains of life. Trends Genet 16: 107 – 109en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagner A ( 2005 ) Energy constraints on the evolution of gene expression. Mol Biol Evol 22: 1365 – 1374en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFraser HB, Hirsh AE, Giaever G, Kumm J, Eisen MB ( 2004 ) Noise minimization in eukaryotic gene expression. PLoS Biol 2: e137en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang Z, Zhang J ( 2011 ) Impact of gene expression noise on organismal fitness and the efficacy of natural selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: E67 – E76en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang JR, Zhuang SM, Zhang J ( 2010 ) Impact of translational error‐induced and error‐free misfolding on the rate of protein evolution. Mol Syst Biol 6: 421en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCherry JL ( 2010 ) Expression level, evolutionary rate, and the cost of expression. Genome Biol Evol 2: 757 – 769en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGout JF, Kahn D, Duret L ( 2010 ) The relationship among gene expression, the evolution of gene dosage, and the rate of protein evolution. PLoS Genet 6: e1000944en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartincorena I, Seshasayee AS, Luscombe NM ( 2012 ) Evidence of non‐random mutation rates suggests an evolutionary risk management strategy. Nature 485: 95 – 98en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang Z ( 2007 ) PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1586 – 1591en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKimura M ( 1980 ) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16: 111 – 120en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHodgkinson A, Eyre‐Walker A ( 2011 ) Variation in the mutation rate across mammalian genomes. Nat Rev Genet 12: 756 – 766en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang GI, Murray AW ( 2011 ) Mutation rates across budding yeast chromosome VI are correlated with replication timing. Genome Biol Evol 3: 799 – 811en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStamatoyannopoulos JA, Adzhubei I, Thurman RE, Kryukov GV, Mirkin SM, Sunyaev SR ( 2009 ) Human mutation rate associated with DNA replication timing. Nat Genet 41: 393 – 395en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen X, Chen Z, Chen H, Su Z, Yang J, Lin F, Shi S, He X ( 2012 ) Nucleosomes suppress spontaneous mutations base‐specifically in eukaryotes. Science 335: 1235 – 1238en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim N, Jinks‐Robertson S ( 2012 ) Transcription as a source of genome instability. Nat Rev Genet 13: 204 – 214en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAguilera A ( 2002 ) The connection between transcription and genomic instability. EMBO J 21: 195 – 201en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSvejstrup JQ ( 2002 ) Mechanisms of transcription‐coupled DNA repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3: 21 – 29en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanawalt PC, Spivak G ( 2008 ) Transcription‐coupled DNA repair: two decades of progress and surprises. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 958 – 970en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSavic DJ, Kanazir DT ( 1972 ) The effect of a histidine operator‐constitutive mutation on UV‐induced mutability within the histidine operon of Salmonella typhimurium. Mol Gen Genet 118: 45 – 50en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerman RK, Dworkin NB ( 1971 ) Effect of gene induction on the rate of mutagenesis by ICR‐191 in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 106: 543 – 550en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeletskii A, Bhagwat AS ( 1996 ) Transcription‐induced mutations: increase in C to T mutations in the nontranscribed strand during transcription in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 13919 – 13924en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTakahashi T, Burguiere‐Slezak G, Van der Kemp PA, Boiteux S ( 2011 ) Topoisomerase 1 provokes the formation of short deletions in repeated sequences upon high transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 692 – 697en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDatta A, Jinks‐Robertson S ( 1995 ) Association of increased spontaneous mutation rates with high levels of transcription in yeast. Science 268: 1616 – 1619en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim N, Jinks‐Robertson S ( 2009 ) dUTP incorporation into genomic DNA is linked to transcription in yeast. Nature 459: 1150 – 1153en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLippert MJ, Kim N, Cho JE, Larson RP, Schoenly NE, O‧Shea SH, Jinks‐Robertson S ( 2011 ) Role for topoisomerase 1 in transcription‐associated mutagenesis in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 698 – 703en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHendriks G, Calleja F, Besaratinia A, Vrieling H, Pfeifer GP, Mullenders LH, Jansen JG, de Wind N ( 2010 ) Transcription‐dependent cytosine deamination is a novel mechanism in ultraviolet light‐induced mutagenesis. Curr Biol 20: 170 – 175en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLynch M et al ( 2008 ) A genome‐wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 9272 – 9277en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNagalakshmi U, Wang Z, Waern K, Shou C, Raha D, Gerstein M, Snyder M ( 2008 ) The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science 320: 1344 – 1349en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGojobori T, Li WH, Graur D ( 1982 ) Patterns of nucleotide substitution in pseudogenes and functional genes. J Mol Evol 18: 360 – 369en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKellis M, Patterson N, Endrizzi M, Birren B, Lander ES ( 2003 ) Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423: 241 – 254en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQian W, Yang JR, Pearson NM, Maclean C, Zhang J ( 2012 ) Balanced codon usage optimizes eukaryotic translational efficiency. PLoS Genet 8: e1002603en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHershberg R, Petrov DA ( 2008 ) Selection on codon bias. Annu Rev Genet 42: 287 – 299en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDrummond DA, Wilke CO ( 2008 ) Mistranslation‐induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding‐sequence evolution. Cell 134: 341 – 352en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePal C, Papp B, Hurst LD ( 2001 ) Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics 158: 927 – 931en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang JR, Liao BY, Zhuang SM, Zhang J ( 2012 ) Protein misinteraction avoidance causes highly expressed proteins to evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: E831 – E840en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParenteau J, Durand M, Morin G, Gagnon J, Lucier JF, Wellinger RJ, Chabot B, Elela SA ( 2011 ) Introns within ribosomal protein genes regulate the production and function of yeast ribosomes. Cell 147: 320 – 331en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJuneau K, Miranda M, Hillenmeyer ME, Nislow C, Davis RW ( 2006 ) Introns regulate RNA and protein abundance in yeast. Genetics 174: 511 – 518en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHwang DG, Green P ( 2004 ) Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sequence analysis reveals varying neutral substitution patterns in mammalian evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 13994 – 14001en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWashietl S, Machne R, Goldman N ( 2008 ) Evolutionary footprints of nucleosome positions in yeast. Trends Genet 24: 583 – 587en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMugal CF, von Grunberg HH, Peifer M ( 2009 ) Transcription‐induced mutational strand bias and its effect on substitution rates in human genes. Mol Biol Evol 26: 131 – 142en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFujita PA et al ( 2011 ) The UCSC Genome Browser database: update 2011. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D876 – D882en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXiong Y, Chen X, Chen Z, Wang X, Shi S, Wang X, Zhang J, He X ( 2010 ) RNA sequencing shows no dosage compensation of the active X‐chromosome. Nat Genet 42: 1043 – 1047en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrawand D et al ( 2011 ) The evolution of gene expression levels in mammalian organs. Nature 478: 343 – 348en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePolak P, Arndt PF ( 2008 ) Transcription induces strand‐specific mutations at the 5' end of human genes. Genome Res 18: 1216 – 1223en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen P, Ewing B, Miller W, Thomas PJ, Green ED ( 2003 ) Transcription‐associated mutational asymmetry in mammalian evolution. Nat Genet 33: 514 – 517en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCho RJ et al ( 1998 ) A genome‐wide transcriptional analysis of the mitotic cell cycle. Mol Cell 2: 65 – 73en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
embr2012165.reviewer_comments.pdf
Size:
191.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
embr2012165-sup-0001.pdf
Size:
90.22KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
embr2012165.pdf
Size:
150.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.