Show simple item record

Who will guard the guardians of neuroscience?

dc.contributor.authorDe Vries, Raymonden_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-08T20:34:39Z
dc.date.available2014-01-08T20:34:39Z
dc.date.issued2007-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationDe Vries, Raymond (2007). "Who will guard the guardians of neuroscience?." EMBO reports 8(1S): S65-S69. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102115>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1469-221Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1469-3178en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102115
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltden_US
dc.titleWho will guard the guardians of neuroscience?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid17726448en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102115/1/embor7401010.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/sj.embor.7401010en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEMBO reportsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRelman AS ( 1980 ) The new medical–industrial complex. N Engl J Med 303: 963 – 970en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnoppers BM ( 2005 ) Neuroethics, new ethics? Am J Bioeth 5: 33en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarcus SJ (ed; 2002 ) Neuroethics: Mapping the Field. New York, NY, USA: Dana Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartensen RL ( 2004 ) Bioethics on the brain. Med Humanit Rev 18: 27 – 45en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMauss M ( 1990 ) The Gift. London, UK: Routledgeen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Connor F ( 1993 ) A Good Man is Hard to Find. New Brunswick, NJ, USA: Rutgers University Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParens E, Johnston J ( 2006 ) Against hyphenated ethics. Bioethics Forum, 8 Sep. www.bioethicsforum.orgen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoskies A ( 2002 ) Neuroethics for the new millenium. Neuron 35: 21 – 23en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSafire W ( 2002 ) Introduction: visions for a new field of ‘neuroethics.’ In Marcus SJ (ed), Neuroethics: Mapping The Field, pp 3 – 9. New York, NY, USA: Dana Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStanford Report ( 2006 ) Illes helps launch neuroethics society. 12 Jul. http://news‐service.stanford.eduen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStevens MLT ( 2000 ) Bioethics in America: Origins and Cultural Politics. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTierney J ( 2007 ) The voices in my head say ‘buy it!’ Why argue? New York Times, 16 Jan, pF1en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilfond BS, Ravitsky V ( 2005 ) On the proliferation of bioethics sub‐disciplines: do we really need “genethics” and “neuroethics”? Am J Bioeth 5: 20 – 21en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerg P ( 2004 ) Asilomar and recombinant DNA. 26 Aug. http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/articles/berg/index.htmlen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBhandari M et al ( 2004 ) Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro‐industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. CMAJ 170: 477 – 480en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBosch X ( 2006 ) Linking neurons and ethics. Science 311: 339en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarey B ( 2007 ) In clue to addictive behavior, a brain injury halts smoking. New York Times, 26 Janen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCassidy J ( 2006 ) Mind games: what neuroeconomics tells us about money and the brain. The New Yorker, 18 Sepen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Vries R ( 2004 ) Businesses are buying the ethics they want. Washington Post, 8 Feb, pB2en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Vries R, Turner L, Orfali K, Bosk C ( 2007 ) The View from Here: Bioethics and the Social Sciences. London, UK: Blackwellen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDouglas M ( 1990 ) No free gifts. In Mauss M (ed), The Gift, p x [foreword]. London, UK: Routledgeen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyer O ( 2004 ) GlaxoSmithKline to set up comprehensive online clinical trials register. BMJ 329: 590en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEmanuel EJ ( 1991 ) The Ends of Human Life: Medical Ethics in a Liberal Polity. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarah MJ ( 2005 ) Neuroethics: the practical and the philosophical. Trends Cogn Sci 9: 34 – 40en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoleman D ( 2006 ) Friends for life: an emerging biology of emotional healing. New York Times, 10 Octen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreene JD, Sommerville RB, Nystrom LE, Darley JM, Cohen JD ( 2001 ) An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgement. Science 293: 2105 – 2108en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHall Z ( 2002 ) Welcome. In Marcus SJ (ed), Neuroethics: Mapping The Field, pp 1 – 2. New York, NY, USA: Dana Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHyde L ( 1983 ) The Gift: Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property. New York, NY, USA: Vintageen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIlles J, Bird SJ ( 2006 ) Neuroethics: a modern context for ethics in neuroscience. Trends Neurosci 29: 511 – 517en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIlles J, Racine E ( 2005 ) Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics. Am J Bioeth 5: 5 – 18en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJonsen AR ( 2002 ) Neuroethics: from Plato's republic to today. In Marcus SJ (ed), Neuroethics: Mapping The Field, pp 273 – 277. New York, NY, USA: Dana Pressen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.