View Item 

Show simple item record

Community assembly by limiting similarity vs. competitive hierarchies: testing the consequences of dispersion of individual traits
dc.contributor.authorHerben, Tomášen_US
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Deborah E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMacDougall, Andrewen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-08T20:35:01Z
dc.date.available2015-03-02T14:35:35Zen_US
dc.date.issued2014-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationHerben, Tomáš ; Goldberg, Deborah E.; MacDougall, Andrew (2014). "Community assembly by limiting similarity vs. competitive hierarchies: testing the consequences of dispersion of individual traits." Journal of Ecology 102(1): 156-166.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-0477en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2745en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102206
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.subject.otherTrait Manipulationen_US
dc.subject.otherArchitectural Traitsen_US
dc.subject.otherClonal Plantsen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunity Diversityen_US
dc.subject.otherDeterminants of Plant Community Diversity and Structureen_US
dc.subject.otherGrowth Traitsen_US
dc.subject.otherParameterized Modelen_US
dc.subject.otherProcess from Pattern Inferenceen_US
dc.titleCommunity assembly by limiting similarity vs. competitive hierarchies: testing the consequences of dispersion of individual traitsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102206/1/jec12181.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2745.12181en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Ecologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShipley, B., Vile, D., Garnier, E., Wright, I.J. & Poorter, H. ( 2005 ) Functional linkages between leaf traits and net photosynthetic rate: reconciling empirical and mechanistic models. Functional Ecology, 19, 602 – 615.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoorter, L., Wright, S.J., Paz, H., Ackerly, D.D., Condit, R., Ibarra‐Manríquez, G. et al. ( 2008 ) Are functional traits good predictors of demographic rates? Evidence from five neotropical forests. Ecology, 89, 1908 – 1920.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrice, J.N. & Pärtel, M. ( 2013 ) Can limiting similarity increase invasion resistance? A meta‐analysis of experimental studies. Oikos, 122, 649 – 656.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRees, M., Grubb, P.J. & Kelly, D. ( 1996 ) Quantifying the impact of competition and spatial heterogeneity on the structure and dynamics of a four‐species guild of winter annuals. The American Naturalist, 147, 1 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReich, P.B., Walters, M.B. & Ellsworth, D.S. ( 1992 ) Leaf lifespan in relation to leaf plant and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecological Monographs, 62, 365 – 392.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRicotta, C. & Moretti, M. ( 2011 ) CWM and Rao's quadratic diversity: a unified framework for functional ecology. Oecologia, 167, 181 – 188.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchamp, B.S., Chau, J. & Aarssen, L.W. ( 2008 ) Dispersion of traits related to competitive ability in an old‐field plant community. Journal of Ecology, 96, 204 – 212.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScheffer, M. & van Nes, E.H. ( 2006 ) Self‐organized similarity: the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 103, 6230 – 6235.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpasojevic, M.J. & Suding, K.N. ( 2012 ) Inferring community assembly mechanisms from functional diversity patterns: the importance of multiple assembly processes. Journal of Ecology, 100, 652 – 661.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS‐PLUS ( 2000 ) S‐PLUS 2000 Guide to statistics. MathSoft, Seattle, WA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwenson, N.G. & Enquist, B.J. ( 2009 ) Opposing assembly mechanisms in a neotropical dry forest: implications for phylogenetic and functional community ecology. Ecology, 90, 2161 – 2170.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurnbull, L.A., Coomes, D.A., Purves, D.W. & Rees, M. ( 2007 ) How spatial structure alters population and community dynamics in a natural plant community. Journal of Ecology, 95, 79 – 89.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVenables, W.N. & Ripley, B.D. ( 1999 ) Modern Applied Statistics with S‐PLUS. Springer, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceViolle, C., Garnier, E., Lecoeur, J., Roumet, C., Podeur, C., Blanchard, A. & Navas, M.‐L. ( 2009 ) Competition, traits and resource depletion in plant communities. Oecologia, 160, 747 – 755.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeiher, E. & Keddy, P. ( 1995 ) The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities. Oikos, 73, 323 – 335.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWestoby, M. ( 1998 ) A leaf‐height‐seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant and Soil, 199, 213 – 227.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWestoby, M., Falster, D.S., Moles, A.T., Vesk, P.A. & Wright, I.J. ( 2002 ) Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 33, 125 – 159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWildová, R., Goldberg, E.D. & Herben, T. ( 2012 ) The contrasting roles of growth traits and architectural traits in diversity maintenance in clonal plant communities. The American Naturalist, 180, 693 – 706.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWildová, R., Herben, T., Gough, L., Hershock, C. & Goldberg, D.E. ( 2007 ) How architectural and growth‐allocation traits affect performance of clonal plants: an analysis using a field‐parameterized simulation model. Oikos, 116, 836 – 852.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWright, I.J. & Westoby, M. ( 1999 ) Differences in seedling growth behaviour among species: trait correlations across species, and trait shifts along nutrient compared to rainfall gradients. Journal of Ecology, 87, 85 – 97.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWright, I.J., Reich, P.B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D.E., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F. et al. ( 2004 ) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 428, 821 – 827.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWright, S.J., Kitajima, K., Kraft, N.J.B., Reich, P.B. et al. ( 2010 ) Functional traits and the growth‐mortality tradeoff in tropical trees. Ecology, 91, 3664 – 3674.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYu, F.‐H., Herben, T., Wildová, R., Hershock, C. & Goldberg, D.E. ( 2012 ) Can we predict performance and spatial structure of two‐species mixtures using only single species information from monocultures? Ecological Modeling, 234, 31 – 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZobel, M., Moora, M. & Herben, T. ( 2010 ) Clonal mobility and its implications for spatio‐temporal patterns of plant communities: what do we need to know next? Oikos, 119, 802 – 806.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAarssen, L.W. ( 1983 ) Ecological combining ability and competitive combining ability in plants: toward a general evolutionary theory of coexistence in systems of competition. The American Naturalist, 122, 707 – 731.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAckerly, D.D. & Cornwell, W.K. ( 2007 ) A trait‐based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within‐ and among‐community components. Ecology Letters, 10, 135 – 145.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdler, P.B., HilleRisLambers, J. & Levine, J.M. ( 2007 ) A niche for neutrality. Ecology Letters, 10, 95 – 104.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceÅgren, G.I. & Fagerström, T. ( 1984 ) Limiting dissimilarity in plants: randomness prevents exclusion of species with similar competitive abilities. Oikos, 43, 369 – 375.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAngert, A.L., Huxman, T.E., Chesson, P. & Venable, D.L. ( 2009 ) Functional tradeoffs determine species coexistence via the storage effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 11641 – 11645.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBennett, J.A., Lamb, E.G., Hall, J.C., Cardinal‐McTeague, W.M. & Cahill, J.F. ( 2013 ) Increased competition does not lead to increased phylogenetic overdispersion in a native grassland. Ecology Letters, 16, 1168 – 1176.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruun, H.H. & ten Brink, D.J. ( 2008 ) Recruitment advantage of large seeds is greater in shaded habitats. Ecoscience, 15, 498 – 507.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceButterfield, B.J. & Suding, K.N. ( 2013 ) Single‐trait functional indices outperform multi‐trait indices in linking environmental gradients and ecosystem services in a complex landscape. Journal of Ecology, 101, 9 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChesson, P. ( 2000 ) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31, 343 – 366.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCornwell, W.K. & Ackerly, D.D. ( 2009 ) Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California. Ecological Monographs, 79, 109 – 126.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Bello, F. ( 2012 ) The quest for trait convergence and divergence in community assembly: are null‐models the magic wand? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 21, 312 – 317.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDíaz, S., Hodgson, J.G., Thompson, K., Cabido, M., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Jalili, A. et al. ( 2004 ) The plant traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents. Journal of Vegetation Science, 15, 295 – 304.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonovan, L.A., Rosenthal, D.R., Sanchez‐Velenosi, M., Rieseberg, L.H. & Ludwig, G.F. ( 2010 ) Are hybrid species more fit than ancestral parent species in the current hybrid species habitats? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23, 805 – 816.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, D., Herben, T. & Wildová, R. ( 2008 ) Consistency vs. contingency of trait‐performance linkages across taxa. Evolutionary Ecology, 22, 477 – 481.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGötzenberger, L., de Bello, F., Brathen, K.A., Davison, J., Dubuis, A., Guisan, A. et al. ( 2011 ) Ecological assembly rules in plant communities – approaches, patterns and prospects. Biological Review, 87, 111 – 127.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrime, J.P. ( 2006 ) Trait convergence and trait divergence in herbaceous plant communities: mechanisms and consequences. Journal Vegetation Science, 17, 255 – 260.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrime, J.P., Thompson, K., Hunt, R., Hodgson, J.G., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Rorison, I.H. et al. ( 1997 ) Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants. Oikos, 79, 259 – 281.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerben, T. & Wildová, R. ( 2012 ) Community‐level effects of plant traits in a grassland community examined by multispecies model of clonal plant growth. Ecological Modeling, 234, 60 – 69.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerben, T., Nováková, Z., Klimešová, J. & Hrouda, L. ( 2012 ) Species traits and plant performance: functional trade‐offs in a large set of species in a botanical garden. Journal of Ecology, 100, 1522 – 1533.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHershock, C. ( 2002 ) Plant community structure in calcareous peatlands (fens): effects of competition, soil environment, and clonal architecture. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeddy, P.A. ( 2001 ) Competition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlimešová, J. & de Bello, F. ( 2009 ) CLO‐PLA: the database of clonal and bud bank traits of Central European flora. Journal of Vegetation Science, 20, 511 – 516.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKraft, N.B.J., Cornwell, W.K., Webb, C.O. & Ackerly, D.D. ( 2007 ) Trait evolution, community assembly, and the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities. The American Naturalist, 170, 271 – 283.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKunstler, G., Lavergne, S., Courbaud, B., Thuiller, W., Vieilledent, G., Zimmermann, N.E., Kattge, J. & Coomes, D.A. ( 2012 ) Competitive interactions between forest trees are driven by species' trait hierarchy, not phylogenetic or functional similarity: implications for forest community assembly. Ecology Letters, 15, 831 – 840.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLepš, J., de Bello, F., Lavorel, S. & Berman, S. ( 2006 ) Quantifying and interpreting functional diversity of natural communities: practical considerations matter. Preslia, 78, 481 – 501.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacArthur, R.H. & Levins, R. ( 1967 ) The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. The American Naturalist, 101, 377 – 385.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarks, C.O. & Lechowicz, M.J. ( 2006 ) Alternative designs and the evolution of functional diversity. The American Naturalist, 167, 55 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMason, N.W.H., MacGillivray, K., Steel, J.B. & Wilson, J.B. ( 2003 ) An index of functional diversity. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14, 571 – 578.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMayfield, M.M. & Levine, J.M. ( 2010 ) Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. Ecology Letters, 13, 1085 – 1093.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeszéna, G., Gyllenberg, M., Pástor, L. & Metz, J.A.J. ( 2006 ) Competitive exclusion and limiting similarity: a unified theory. Theoretical Population Biology, 69, 68 – 87.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMouquet, N., Moore, J.L. & Loreau, M. ( 2002 ) Plant species richness and community productivity: why the mechanism that promotes coexistence matters. Ecology Letters, 5, 56 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePacala, S.W., Canham, C.D. & Silander, J.A.J. ( 1993 ) Forest models defined by field measurements: I. The design of a northeastern forest simulator. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research, 23, 1980 – 1988.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePakeman, R.J., Lennon, J.J. & Brooker, R.E. ( 2011 ) Trait assembly in plant assemblages and its modulation by productivity and disturbance. Oecologia, 167, 209 – 218.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeck, S.L. ( 2004 ) Simulation as experiment: a philosophical reassessment for biological modeling. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 530 – 534.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jec12181.pdf
Size:
283.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.