View Item 

Show simple item record

Humility and respect: core values in medical education
dc.contributor.authorGruppen, Larry Den_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-08T20:35:11Z
dc.date.available2015-03-02T14:35:35Zen_US
dc.date.issued2014-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationGruppen, Larry D (2014). "Humility and respect: core values in medical education." Medical Education (1): 53-58.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0308-0110en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2923en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102253
dc.publisherCornell University Pressen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleHumility and respect: core values in medical educationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102253/1/medu12269.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/medu.12269en_US
dc.identifier.sourceMedical Educationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEva KW. Trending in 2014: Hippocrates. Med Educ 2014; 48: 1 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNaughton N, LeBlanc V. The central role of emotional competence in medical training. In: Hodges BD, Lingard L, eds. The Question of Competence: Reconsidering Medical Education in the Twenty‐first Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 2012; 70 – 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEva KW, Regehr G, Gruppen LD. Blinded by ‘insight’: self‐assessment and its role in performance improvement. In: Hodges BD, Lingard L, eds. The Question of Competence: Reconsidering Medical Education in the Twenty‐first Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 2012; 131 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSniezek JA, van Swol LM. Trust, confidence, and expertise in a judge‐advisor system. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2001; 84: 288 – 307.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaw J, Lodge P. Science for Social Scientists. London: MacMillan 1984.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruner JS. On Going Beyond the Information Given. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University 1957.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGruppen LD. Is medical education research ‘hard’ or ‘soft’ research? Adv Health Sci Educ 2008; 13: 1 – 2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchuwirth L, Colliver J, Gruppen L et al. Research in assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach 2011; 33: 224 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRingsted C, Hodges B, Scherpbier A. ‘The Research Compass’: An Introduction to Research in Medical Education. AMEE Guide No. zr56. Dundee: Association for Medical Education in Europe 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbert M. Understanding the debate on medical education research: a sociological perspective. Acad Med 2004; 79 ( 10 ): 948 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbert M, Hodges B, Regehr G. Research in medical education: balancing service and science. Adv Health Sci Educ 2007; 12: 103 – 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaplan S. Beyond rationality: clarity‐based decision making. In: Garling T, Evans GW, eds. Environment, Cognition, and Action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press 1991; 171 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruner JS. On perceptual readiness. Psychol Rev 1957; 64: 123 – 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCroskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimise them. Acad Med 2003; 78: 775 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Sullivan PS, Stoddard HA, Kalishman S. Collaborative research in medical education: a discussion of theory and practice. Med Educ 2010; 44: 1175 – 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorman G. Chaos, complexity and complicatedness: lessons from rocket science. Med Educ 2011; 45: 549 – 59.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
medu12269.pdf
Size:
73.66KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.