Narrating Early Islamic History.
dc.contributor.author | Samji, Karim | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-01-16T20:43:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-01-16T20:43:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | en_US |
dc.date.submitted | en_US | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102483 | |
dc.description.abstract | Early Islamic historiography is at a critical juncture. For over a century, source-critical, tradition-critical, and skeptical historians have grappled with the Arabic historical tradition without reaching a consensus. In fact, recent studies demonstrating the unreliability of sources once held to be foundational have only further compounded the problem. As a result, the history of early Islam continues to elude historians. In addition to the lack of archaeological evidence, the source limits for narrating the history of early Islam are marked by the late provenance of textual sources, their high rate of attrition, and the shortcomings inherent in the literary genre itself. These source limits raise three research questions: (i) How is the problem of early Islamic history framed? (ii) What is the entry point into the past? (iii) How can early Islamic history be reconstructed? As a critical introduction to early Islamic historiography, this dissertation grapples mainly with methodological issues in order to rethink past approaches and develop new ones. The dissertation is divided into two sections: (i) historiography and (ii) historical reconstruction. Following a historiographical survey of both primary and secondary sources, Chapter 1 investigates the operative theories and assumptions employed by classical and modern historians. As an exercise in applied method, it uncovers the earliest thematic stratum of Arabic historical writing. After challenging the basic assumption of this stratum’s chronological limits, a viable alternative that fits the fragmented historical record is advanced. Subsequently, this chapter substantiates the use of the comparative method to repair the damaged narrative. Having accomplished these essential tasks, the three subsequent chapters narrate a historical reconstruction of early Islam. The publication of this dissertation will undoubtedly prove to be a substantial contribution to the international, academic debate on the genesis and development of Islam. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Apostasia Arabum | en_US |
dc.title | Narrating Early Islamic History. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Near Eastern Studies | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Hagen, Gottfried J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Bonner, Michael David | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Muehlberger, Ellen | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Cipa, Hakki Erdem | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102483/1/ksamji_1.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.