Show simple item record

Co-Teaching: To what Extent does it Change Teachers' Perceived Efficacy in the Instruction of Students with Disabilities in a General Education Classroom?

dc.contributor.authorSepetys, Peggy
dc.contributor.advisorLazarus, Belinda
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-17T16:40:05Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2014-01-17T16:40:05Z
dc.date.issued2013-12-14
dc.date.submitted2013-07-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102512
dc.description.abstractThis mixed method research investigates the extent of change in general and special education teachers’ perceived efficacy after co-teaching. The social cognitive theory of self-efficacy guides this study, which approaches teachers’ perceptions as an indicator of one’s ability to change or persist in behaviors, such as teaching. Using a quantitative and qualitative sequential design, this study uses survey methodology and small-scale follow-up interviews. The integrated findings illuminate the perceptions of teachers before and after co- teaching. The main conclusions are discussed with regard to existing literature on co-teaching. Overall, results indicate that there is an increase in teachers’ perception of their ability to instruct students with disabilities within the general education classroom after co-teaching. It appears that co-teaching may play a role in their ability to provide the appropriate instruction to students with disabilities in the general education classroom. In addition, this study concludes that although teachers perceive they are allotted more planning time as they co-teach, the lack of quality time may be negatively impacting the role of special educators in the co-taught classroom. This mixed method research investigates the extent of change in general and special education teachers’ perceived efficacy after co-teaching. The social cognitive theory of self-efficacy guides this study, which approaches teachers’ perceptions as an indicator of one’s ability to change or persist in behaviors, such as teaching. Using a quantitative and qualitative sequential design, this study uses survey methodology and small-scale follow-up interviews. The integrated findings illuminate the perceptions of teachers before and after co- teaching. The main conclusions are discussed with regard to existing literature on co-teaching. Overall, results indicate that there is an increase in teachers’ perception of their ability to instruct students with disabilities within the general education classroom after co-teaching. It appears that co-teaching may play a role in their ability to provide the appropriate instruction to students with disabilities in the general education classroom. In addition, this study concludes that although teachers perceive they are allotted more planning time as they co-teach, the lack of quality time may be negatively impacting the role of special educators in the co-taught classroom.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectCo-teachingen_US
dc.subjectCollaborationen_US
dc.subjectGeneral and Special Educationen_US
dc.subjectProfessional Developmenten_US
dc.subjectSelf-efficacyen_US
dc.subjectTeacher Educationen_US
dc.subject.otherEducationen_US
dc.titleCo-Teaching: To what Extent does it Change Teachers' Perceived Efficacy in the Instruction of Students with Disabilities in a General Education Classroom?en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameDoctor of Education (EdD)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineCollege of Education, Health, and Human Servicesen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan-Dearbornen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberCalahan, Thomas
dc.contributor.committeememberBrunvand, Stein
dc.identifier.uniqname88120401en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102512/1/Sepetys Peggy - Ed.D. Dissertation.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.