Class Action Litigation after Dukes: In Search of a Remedy for Gender Discrimination
dc.contributor.author | Schipani, Cindy A. | |
dc.contributor | Dworkin, Terry Morehead | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-01-31T13:31:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-01-31T13:31:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-11 | |
dc.identifier | 1220 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102574 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this Article we argue for substantial reforms to our system of combating workplace gender discrimination in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes. To help counter discrimination victims’ decreasing access to the courts, our proposals call for a narrow construction of the holding of Dukes. At the same time, agencies such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) can better use their regulatory authority to address gender discrimination. Further, regulatory agencies, arbitrators, and courts can mandate mentoring programs to assist employees in overcoming the effects of discrimination and provide a potential pathway for career success. | en_US |
dc.subject | class actions | en_US |
dc.subject | gender | en_US |
dc.subject | employment | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Law, History, Communication | en_US |
dc.title | Class Action Litigation after Dukes: In Search of a Remedy for Gender Discrimination | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Ross School of Business | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Indiana University Bloomington | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102574/1/1220_Schipani.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Business, Stephen M. Ross School of - Working Papers Series |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.