View Item 

Show simple item record

Genetic services and attitudes in primary care pediatrics
dc.contributor.authorRinke, Michael L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMikat‐stevens, Natalieen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaul, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.authorDriscoll, Amyen_US
dc.contributor.authorHealy, Jillen_US
dc.contributor.authorTarini, Beth A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-11T17:57:03Z
dc.date.available2015-04-01T19:59:06Zen_US
dc.date.issued2014-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationRinke, Michael L.; Mikat‐stevens, Natalie ; Saul, Robert; Driscoll, Amy; Healy, Jill; Tarini, Beth A. (2014). "Genetic services and attitudes in primary care pediatrics." American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 164(2): 449-455.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1552-4825en_US
dc.identifier.issn1552-4833en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102660
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherCrown copyrighten_US
dc.subject.otherElectronic Health Recorden_US
dc.subject.otherGeneticsen_US
dc.subject.otherPediatricsen_US
dc.subject.otherPrimary Careen_US
dc.subject.otherFamily Historyen_US
dc.titleGenetic services and attitudes in primary care pediatricsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeneticsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102660/1/ajmga36339.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ajmg.a.36339en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part Aen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePyeritz RE. 2012. The family history: The first genetic test, and still useful after all those years ? Genet Med 14: 3 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEmery J, Watson E, Rose P, Andermann A. 1999. A systematic review of the literature exploring the role of primary care in genetic services. Fam Pract 16: 426 – 445.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreendale K, Pyeritz RE. 2001. Empowering primary care health professionals in medical genetics: How soon? How fast? How far ? Am J Med Genet 106: 223 – 232.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuttmacher AE, Collins FS, Carmona RH. 2004. The family history—More important than ever. N Engl J Med 351: 2333 – 2336.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarrison TA, Hindorff LA, Kim H, Wines RC, Bowen DJ, McGrath BB, Edwards KL. 2003. Family history of diabetes as a potential public health tool. Am J Prev Med 24: 152 – 159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHenneman L, Timmermans DR, van der Wal G. 2004. Public experiences, knowledge and expectations about medical genetics and the use of genetic information. Community Genet 7: 33 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHouwink EJ, van Luijk SJ, Henneman L, van der Vleuten C, Jan Dinant G, Cornel MC. 2011. Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: A focus group study with multiple perspectives. BMC Fam Pract 12: 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson TP, Wislar JS. 2012. Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys. JAMA 307: 1805 – 1806.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKemper AR, Bailey DB Jr. 2009. Pediatricians' knowledge of and attitudes toward fragile X syndrome screening. Acad Pediatr 9: 114 – 117.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKemper AR, Uren RL, Moseley KL, Clark SJ. 2006. Primary care physicians' attitudes regarding follow‐up care for children with positive newborn screening results. Pediatrics 118: 1836 – 1841.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKolb SE, Aguilar MC, Dinenberg M, Kaye CI. 1999. Genetics education for primary care providers in community health settings. J Community Health 24: 45 – 59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCahon D, Holder R, Metcalfe A, Clifford S, Gill P, Cole T, Sleightholme HV, Wilson S. 2009. General practitioners' attitudes to assessment of genetic risk of common disorders in routine primary care. Clin Genet 76: 544 – 551.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Neill SM, Rubinstein WS, Wang C, Yoon PW, Acheson LS, Rothrock N, Starzyk EJ, Beaumont JL, Galliher JM, Ruffin MTt. 2009. Familial risk for common diseases in primary care: The Family Healthware Impact Trial. Am J Prev Med 36: 506 – 514.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrlando LA, Hauser ER, Christianson C, Powell KP, Buchanan AH, Chesnut B, Agbaje AB, Henrich VC, Ginsburg G. 2011. Protocol for implementation of family health history collection and decision support into primary care using a computerized family health history system. BMC Health Serv Res 11: 264.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQureshi N, Armstrong S, Dhiman P, Saukko P, Middlemass J, Evans PH, Kai J. 2012. Effect of adding systematic family history enquiry to cardiovascular disease risk assessment in primary care: A matched‐pair, cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 156: 253 – 262.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoth R. 2007. Congenital disabilities and the law. Clin Perinatol 34: 263 – 273, v–vi.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShapira A. 1998. 'Wrongful life' lawsuits for faulty genetic counselling: Should the impaired newborn be entitled to sue ? J Med Ethics 24: 369 – 375.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSilversides A. 2007. The wide gap between genetic research and clinical needs. CMAJ 176: 315 – 316.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuchard MA, Yudkin P, Sinsheimer JS, Fowler GH. 1999. General practitioners' views on genetic screening for common diseases. Br J Gen Pract 49: 45 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuther S, Goodson P. 2003. Barriers to the provision of genetic services by primary care physicians: A systematic review of the literature. Genet Med 5: 70 – 76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrinidad SB, Fryer‐Edwards K, Crest A, Kyler P, Lloyd‐Puryear MA, Burke W. 2008. Educational needs in genetic medicine: Primary care perspectives. Community Genet 11: 160 – 165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrotter TL, Martin HM. 2007. Family history in pediatric primary care. Pediatrics 120: S60 – S65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWu RR, Orlando LA, Himmel TL, Buchanan AH, Powell KP, Hauser ER, Agbaje AB, Henrich VC, Ginsburg GS. 2013. Patient and primary care provider experience using a family health history collection, risk stratification, and clinical decision support tool: A type 2 hybrid controlled implementation‐effectiveness trial. BMC Fam Pract 14: 111.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoon PW, Scheuner MT, Khoury MJ. 2003. Research priorities for evaluating family history in the prevention of common chronic diseases. Am J Prev Med 24: 128 – 135.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAcheson LS, Zyzanski SJ, Stange KC, Deptowicz A, Wiesner GL. 2006. Validation of a self‐administered, computerized tool for collecting and displaying the family history of cancer. J Clin Oncol 24: 5395 – 5402.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBishop M, Metcalfe S, Gaff C. 2008. The missing element: Consanguinity as a component of genetic risk assessment. Genet Med 10: 612 – 620.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlumenthal D, Tavenner M. 2010. The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 363: 501 – 504.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChang L. 1994. A psychometric evaluation of 4‐point and 6‐point likert‐type scales in relation to reliability and validity. Appl Psychol Meas 18: 205 – 215.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen MJ, Holt CL, Lose EJ, Robin NH. 2008. The use by Alabama pediatricians of genetics consultation in the evaluation of developmental delay. Am J Med Genet Part A 146A: 421 – 425.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohn WF, Ropka ME, Pelletier SL, Barrett JR, Kinzie MB, Harrison MB, Liu Z, Miesfeldt S, Tucker AL, Worrall BB, Gibson J, Mullins IM, Elward KS, Franko J, Guterbock TM, Knaus WA. 2010. Health Heritage(c) a web‐based tool for the collection and assessment of family health history: Initial user experience and analytic validity. Public Health Genomics 13: 477 – 491.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCole Johnson C, Ownby DR, Havstad SL, Peterson EL. 2004. Family history, dust mite exposure in early childhood, and risk for pediatric atopy and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 114: 105 – 110.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCommittee on Genetics. 2000. Molecular genetic testing in pediatric practice: A subject review. Pediatrics 106: 1494 – 1497.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDepartment of Health. 2003. Our inheritance, our future realising the potential of genetics in the NHS. London: Crown copyright.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ajmga36339.pdf
Size:
106.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.