Show simple item record

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of famotidine and ranitidine in critically ill children

dc.contributor.authorMadani, Shailenderen_US
dc.contributor.authorKauffman, Ralphen_US
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, Pippaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLehr, Victoria Tutagen_US
dc.contributor.authorLai, Mary Liehen_US
dc.contributor.authorSarniak, Ashoken_US
dc.contributor.authorTolia, Vasundharaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-11T17:57:09Z
dc.date.available2015-04-01T19:59:07Zen_US
dc.date.issued2014-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationMadani, Shailender; Kauffman, Ralph; Simpson, Pippa; Lehr, Victoria Tutag; Lai, Mary Lieh; Sarniak, Ashok; Tolia, Vasundhara (2014). "Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of famotidine and ranitidine in critically ill children." The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 54(2): 201-205.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0091-2700en_US
dc.identifier.issn1552-4604en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102678
dc.description.abstractTo characterize and compare acid suppression (pharmacodynamics) and pharmacokinetics of IV famotidine and ranitidine in critically ill children at risk for stress gastritis. Single‐blind, randomized study in PICU patients 6 months to 18 years requiring mechanical ventilation with continuous gastric pH monitoring, randomized to IV famotidine 12 mg/m 2 or ranitidine 60 mg/m 2 when gastric pH < 4.0 >1 hour with serial blood sampling following first dose. Twenty‐four children randomized to either famotidine (n = 12) or ranitidine (n = 12). Sixteen out of twenty‐four completed both PK and PD study arms (7/12 famotidine; 4.7 ± 3.4 years; 9/12 ranitidine; 6.6 ± 4.7 years; p  = 0.38). Time to gastric pH 4.0 and total time pH above 4.0 similar with no difference in pH at 6 and 12 hours ( p  > 0.2). No difference between drugs in clearance, volume of distribution and half‐life ( p  > 0.05). Ratio of AUC pH to AUC drug concentration 0–12 hours after first dose was significantly greater for famotidine (0.06849 ± 0.01460 SD) than ranitidine (0.02453 ± 0.01448; p  < 0.001) demonstrating greater potency of famotidine. pH lowering efficacy of both drugs is similar. Greater potency of famotidine may offer clinical advantage due to lower drug exposure and less frequent dosing to achieve same pH lowering effect.en_US
dc.publisherNottingham University Pressen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherFamotidineen_US
dc.subject.otherRanitidineen_US
dc.subject.otherPediatric Intensive Care Uniten_US
dc.subject.otherPharmacokineticsen_US
dc.subject.otherPharmacodynamicsen_US
dc.subject.otherGastric Acid Suppressionen_US
dc.titlePharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of famotidine and ranitidine in critically ill childrenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPediatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPharmacy and Pharmacologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102678/1/jcph219.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jcph.219en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaples HD, James LP, Stowe CD, et al. Famotidine disposition in children with adolescents with chronic renal insufficiency. J Clin Pharmacol. 2003; 43: 7 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeerojanawong J, Peongsujarit D, Vivatvakin B, Prapphal N. Incidence and risk factors of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in mechanically ventilated children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009; 10 ( 1 ): 91 – 95. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181936a37en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReveiz L, Guerrero‐Lozano R, Camacho A, Yara L, Mosquera PA. Stress ulcer, gastritis, and gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill pediatric patients: a systematic review. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010; 11 ( 1 ): 124 – 132. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181b80e70en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAli T, Harty R. Stress induced ulcer bleeding in critically ill patients. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2009; 38: 245 – 265.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Society of Health‐System Pharmacists. ASHP therapeutic guidelines on stress ulcer prophylaxis. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999; 56: 347 – 379.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DJ, Witt LG, Cook RJ, et al. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the critically ill: a meta‐analysis. Am J Med. 1991; 91: 519 – 527.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChin TWF, MacLeod SM, Fenje P, Baltodano A, Edmonds JF, Soldin SJ. Pharmacokinetics of cimetidine in critically‐ill children. Pediatr Pharmacol. 1983; 2: 285 – 292.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLugo RA, Harrison AM, Cash J, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ranitidine in critically ill children. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29 ( 4 ): 759 – 764.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJames LP, Kearns GL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of famotidine in paediatric patients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996; 31 ( 2 ) 103 – 110.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKraus G, Krishna DR, Chmelarsch D, Schmid M, Klotz U. Famotidine, pharmacokinetic properties and suppression of acid secretion in pediatric patients following cardiac surgery. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1990; 18 ( 1 ): 77 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWenning LA, Murphy MG, James LP, et al. Pharmacokinetics of famotidine in infants. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005; 44 ( 4 ): 395 – 406.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDu W, Tutag Lehr V, Caverly M, Kelm L, Lieh‐Lai M. Adverse drug reactions in pediatric intensive care unit. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013; 53 ( 5 ): 567 – 573.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChoonara I, Rieder MJ. Drug Toxicity and Adverse Drug Reactions in Children—A Brief Historical Review. Nottingham, England: Nottingham University Press; 2004.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeeder JS. Developmental pediatric pharmacogenomics. Pharmacogenomics. 2003; 4 ( 3 ): 331 – 341.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZiemniak JA, Assael BM, Padoan R, Schentag JJ. The bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of cimetidine and its metabolites in juvenile cystic fibrosis patient: age‐related differences as compared to adults. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1984; 26: 183 – 189.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTreem WR, Davis PM, Hyams JS. Suppression of gastric acid secretion by intravenous use of famotidine in children. J Pediatr. 1991; 118 ( 5 ): 812 – 816.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarrison AM, Lugo RA, Vernon DD. Gastric pH control in critically ill children receiving iv ranitidine. Crit Care Med. 1998; 26: 1433 – 1436.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHawwa AF, Westwood PM, Collier PS, et al. Prophylactic ranitidine treatment in critically ill children—a population pharmacokinetic study. Br J Pharmacol. 2013; 75 ( 5 ): 1265 – 1276.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWincek WC. Analytical methodology for quantitation of Famotidine and H 2 receptor blockers in plasma and urine. J Chromotogr. 1985; 338: 438 – 443.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarnes HT, Opong‐Mensah K, Farthing D, Beightol LA. Automated solid phase extraction and high performance liquid chromatographic determination of rantidine from urine, plasma and peritoneal dialysate. J Chromatogr. 1987; 422: 165 – 173.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuitunen A, Vento A, Suojaranta‐Ylinen R, Pettila V. Acute renal failure after cardiac surgery: evaluation of the RIFLE classification. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 81: 542 – 546.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.