View Item 

Show simple item record

Why does a good thing become too much? Interactions between foliar nutrients and toxins determine performance of an insect herbivore
dc.contributor.authorTao, Leilingen_US
dc.contributor.authorBerns, Alexandra R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Mark D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Marcen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-11T17:57:11Z
dc.date.available2015-04-01T19:59:07Zen_US
dc.date.issued2014-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationTao, Leiling; Berns, Alexandra R.; Hunter, Mark D.; Johnson, Marc (2014). "Why does a good thing become too much? Interactions between foliar nutrients and toxins determine performance of an insect herbivore." Functional Ecology 28(1): 190-196.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0269-8463en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2435en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102682
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, ltden_US
dc.subject.otherNitrogenen_US
dc.subject.otherNutrient–Toxin Interactionsen_US
dc.subject.otherPhosphorusen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant–Insect Interactionsen_US
dc.subject.otherHerbivoreen_US
dc.subject.otherDanaus Plexippusen_US
dc.subject.otherChemical Defenceen_US
dc.subject.otherAsclepiasen_US
dc.titleWhy does a good thing become too much? Interactions between foliar nutrients and toxins determine performance of an insect herbivoreen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102682/1/fec12163.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102682/2/fec12163-sup-0001-LaySummary.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2435.12163en_US
dc.identifier.sourceFunctional Ecologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimpson, S.J. & Raubenheimer, D. ( 2001 ) The geometric analysis of nutrient‐allelochemical interactions: a case study using locusts. Ecology, 82, 422 – 439.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHunter, M.D., Watt, A.D. & Docherty, M. ( 1991 ) Outbreaks of the winter moth on Sitka spruce in Scotland are not influenced by nutrient deficiencies of trees, tree budburst or pupal predation. Oecologia, 86, 62 – 69.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoern, A. & Behmer, S. T. ( 1998 ) Impact of diet quality on demographic attributes in adult grasshoppers and the nitrogen limitation hypothesis. Ecological Entomology, 23, 174 – 184.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKleinbaum, D.G., Kupper, L.L., Muller, K.E. & Nizam, A. ( 2007 ) Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods, 4th edn. Thomson Learning, Inc., Belmont, California.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoricheva, J., Larsson, S., Haukioja, E. & Keinanen, M. ( 1998 ) Regulation of woody plant secondary metabolism by resource availability: hypothesis testing by means of meta‐analysis. Oikos, 83, 212 – 226.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLavoie, B. & Oberhauser, K.S. ( 2004 ) Compensatory feeding in Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in response to variation in host plant quality. Environmental Entomologist, 33, 1062 – 1069.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMattson, W.J. ( 1980 ) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11, 119 – 161.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePlath, K. & Boersma, M. ( 2001 ) Mineral limitation of zooplankton: stoichiometric constraints and optimal foraging. Ecology, 82, 1260 – 1269.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR Development Core Team ( 2011 ). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaubenheimer, D. & Simpson, S.J. ( 1999 ) Integrating nutrition: a geometrical approach. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 91, 67 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaubenheimer, D. & Simpson, S.J. ( 2009 ) Nutritional PharmEcology: doses, nutrients, toxins, and medicines. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 49, 329 – 337.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimpson, S.J. & Raubenheimer, D. ( 1993 ) A multi‐Level analysis of feeding behaviour: the geometry of nutritional decisions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 342, 381 – 402.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimpson, S.J., Sibly, R.M., Lee, K.P., Behmer, S.T. & Raubenheimer, D. ( 2004 ) Optimal foraging when regulating intake of multiple nutrients. Animal Behavior, 68, 1299 – 1311.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpeight, M. R., Hunter, M. D. & Watt, A. D. ( 2008 ) The Ecology of Insects: Concepts and Applications, 2nd edn. Wiley‐Blackwell, Oxford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSternberg, E.D., Lefevre, T., Li, J., de Castillejo, C.L.F., Li, H., Hunter, M.D. et al. ( 2012 ) Food plant derived disease tolerance and resistance in a natural butterfly‐plant‐parasite interactions. Evolution, 66, 3367 – 3376.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSterner, R.W. & Elser, J.J. ( 2002 ) Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTao, L. & Hunter, M.D. ( 2012 ) Does anthropogenic nitrogen deposition induce phosphorus limitation in herbivorous insects? Global Change Biology, 18, 1843 – 1853.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThroop, H.L. & Lerdau, M.T. ( 2004 ) Effects of nitrogen deposition on insect herbivory: implications for community and ecosystem processes. Ecosystems, 7, 109 – 133.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVannette, R.L. & Hunter, M.D. ( 2011 ) Plant defence theory re‐examined: nonlinear expectations based on the costs and benefits of resource mutualisms. Journal of Ecology, 99, 66 – 76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVon Liebig, J. ( 1840 ) Die Organische Chemie in ihre Anwendung auf Agricultur und Physiologie. F. Vieweg und Sohn, Braunschweig, Germany.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZalucki, M.P., Brower, L.P. & Malcolm, S.B. ( 1990 ) Oviposition by Danaus plexippus in relation to cardenolide content of three Asclepias species in the southeastern U.S.A. Ecological Entomology, 15, 231 – 240.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZalucki, M.P., Malcolm, S.B., Paine, T.D., Hanlon, C.C., Brower, L.P. & Clarke, A.R. ( 2001 ) It's the first bites that count: survival of first‐instar monarchs on milkweeds. Austral Ecology, 26, 547 – 555.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZehnder, C.B. & Hunter, M.D. ( 2008 ) Effects of nitrogen deposition on the interaction between an aphid and its host plant. Ecological Entomology, 33, 24 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZehnder, C.B. & Hunter, M.D. ( 2009 ) More is not necessarily better: the impact of limiting and excessive nutrients on herbivore population growth rates. Ecological Entomology, 34, 535 – 543.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgrawal, A.A. & Fishbein, M. ( 2006 ) Plant defense syndromes. Ecology, 87, S132 – S149.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgrawal, A.A. & Malcolm, S.B. ( 2002 ) Once upon a milkweed ‐ In this complex community, one insects poison may be another meal. Natural History, 111, 48 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgrawal, A.A., Petscchenka, G., Bingham, R.A., Weber, M.G. & Rasmaan, S. ( 2012 ) Toxic cardenolides: chemical ecology and co‐evolution of specialized plant‐herbivore interactions. New Phytologist, 194, 28 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoersma, M. & Elser, J.J. ( 2006 ) Too much of a good thing: On stoichiometrically balanced diets and maximal growth. Ecology, 81, 1325 – 1330.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBryant, J.P., Chapin, F.S. & Klein, D.R. ( 1983 ) Carbon nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos, 40, 357 – 368.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrawley, M.J. ( 2007 ) The R Book. John Wiley & Sons, ltd., West Sussex, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCruz‐Rivera, E. & Hay, M.E. ( 2003 ) Prey nutritional quality interacts with chemical defenses to affect consumer feeding and fitness. Ecological Monographs, 73, 483 – 506.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeGabriel, J.L., Moore, B.D., Foley, W.J. & Johnson, C.N. ( 2009 ) The effects of plant defensive chemistry on nutrient availability predict reproductive success in a mammal. Ecology, 90, 711 – 719.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElser, J.J., Bracken, M.E.S., Cleland, E.E., Gruner, D.S., Harpole, W.S., Hillebrand, H. et al. ( 2007 ) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecolgy Letters, 10, 1135 – 1142.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFagan, W.F. & Denno, R.F. ( 2004 ) Stoichiometry of actual vs. potential predator‐prey interactions: insights into nitrogen limitation for arthropod predators. Ecology Letters, 7, 876 – 883.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischer, K. & Fiedler, K. ( 2000 ) Response of the copper butterfly Lycaena tityrus to increased leaf nitrogen in natural food plants: evidence against the nitrogen limitation hypothesis. Oecologia, 124, 235 – 241.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGleeson, S.K. & Tilman, D. ( 1992 ) Plant allocation and the multiple limitation hypothesis. American Natualist, 139, 1322 – 1343.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlendinning, J. I. & Slansky, F. ( 1994 ) Interactions of allelochemicals with dietary constituents ‐ effects on deterrency. Physiological Entomology, 19, 173 – 186.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHamilton, J. G., Zangerl, A. R., DeLucia, E. H. & Berenbaum, M. R. ( 2001 ) The carbon‐nutrient balance hypothesis: its rise and fall. Ecology Letters, 4, 86 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlendinning, J.I. & Slansky, F. ( 1995 ) Consumption of a toxic food by caterpillars increases with dietary exposure ‐ support for a role of induced detoxification enzymes. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 176, 337 – 345.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerms, D.A. & Mattson, W.J. ( 1992 ) The dilemma of plants ‐ to grow or defend. Quarterly Review of Biology, 67, 283 – 335.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
fec12163.pdf
Size:
251.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
fec12163-sup-0001-LaySummary.pdf
Size:
139.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.