View Item 

Show simple item record

Validity, discriminative ability, and reliability of the hearing‐related quality of life questionnaire for adolescents
dc.contributor.authorRachakonda, Taraen_US
dc.contributor.authorJeffe, Donna B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShin, Jennifer J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMankarious, Leilaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFanning, Robert J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLesperance, Marci M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLieu, Judith E.C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-11T17:57:11Z
dc.date.available2015-04-01T19:59:07Zen_US
dc.date.issued2014-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationRachakonda, Tara; Jeffe, Donna B.; Shin, Jennifer J.; Mankarious, Leila; Fanning, Robert J.; Lesperance, Marci M.; Lieu, Judith E.C. (2014). "Validity, discriminative ability, and reliability of the hearing‐related quality of life questionnaire for adolescents." The Laryngoscope 124(2): 570-578.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0023-852Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1531-4995en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102684
dc.publisherWashington University School of Medicineen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherAdolescentsen_US
dc.subject.otherHearing Lossen_US
dc.subject.otherValidation Studyen_US
dc.subject.otherQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.titleValidity, discriminative ability, and reliability of the hearing‐related quality of life questionnaire for adolescentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOtolaryngologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102684/1/lary24336.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/lary.24336en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Laryngoscopeen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Eldik T. Mental health problems of Dutch youth with hearing loss as shown on the Youth Self Report. Am Ann Deaf 2005; 150: 11 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFellinger J, Holzinger D, Sattel H, Laucht M, Goldberg D. Correlates of mental health disorders among children with hearing impairments. Dev Med Child Neurol 2009; 51: 635 – 641.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMohr PE, Feldman JJ, Dunbar JL, et al. The societal costs of severe to profound hearing loss in the United States. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000; 16: 1120 – 1135.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUmansky AM, Jeffe DB, Lieu JE. The HEAR‐QL: quality of life questionnaire for children with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 2011; 22: 644 – 653.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVarni J. Pediatric Quality of Life (Peds‐QL) Inventory Administration Guidelines. http://www.pedsql.org/PedsQLguidelines.doc. Accessed March 14, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuris P., Meesters C., Schouten E. A brief questionnaire of DSM‐IV defined anxiety and depression symptoms among children. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 2002; 1: 430 – 442.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman CW, Weinstein BE, Jacobson GP, Hug GA. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults: psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 430 – 433.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman CW, Weinstein BE, Jacobson GP, Hug GA. Test‐retest reliability of the hearing handicap inventory for adults. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 355 – 357.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata‐driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42: 377 – 381.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStreufert A. Quality of life measure for adolescents and children with hearing loss. Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine. 2008. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/pacs_capstones/437/ Accessed March 14,2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLautenschlager GJ. A comparison of alternatives to conducting Monte Carlo analyses for determining parallel analysis criteria. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1989; 24: 365 – 395.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVelicer WF. Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika 1976; 41: 321 – 327.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman CW, Jacobson GP, Hug GA, Sandridge SA. Perceived hearing handicap of patients with unilateral or mild hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997; 106: 210 – 214.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKent B, Smith S. They only see it when the sun shines in my ears: exploring perceptions of adolescent hearing aid users. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2006; 11: 461 – 476.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatrick DL, Edwards TC, Skalicky AM, et al. Validation of a quality‐of‐life measure for deaf or hard of hearing youth. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 145: 137 – 145.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorowitz JA, Vessey J, Carlson KL, et al. Teasing and bullying experiences of middle school students. J Am Nurses Assoc 2005; 10: 165 – 172.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBess FH, Dodd‐Murphy J, Parker RA. Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 339 – 354.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFellinger J, Holzinger D, Beitel C, Laucht M, Goldberg DP. The impact of language skills on mental health in teenagers with hearing impairments. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2009; 120: 153 – 159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuber M. Health‐related quality of life of Austrian children and adolescents with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 69: 1089 – 1101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoy B, Warner‐Czyz AD, Tong L, Tobey EA, Roland PS. The children speak: an examination of the quality of life of pediatric cochlear implant users. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 142: 247 – 253.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMulrow CD, Aguilar C, Endicott JE et al. Quality‐of‐life changes and hearing impairment. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113: 188 – 194.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChisolm TH, Johnson CE, Danhauer JL, et al. A systematic review of health‐related quality of life and hearing aids: final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force on the Health‐Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18: 151 – 183.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson CE, Danhauer JL, Gavin RB, Karns SR, Reith AC, Lopez IP. The “hearing aid effect” 2005: a rigorous test of the visibility of new hearing aid styles. Am J Audiol 2005; 14: 169 – 175.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989; 10: 407 – 415.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShargorodsky J, Curhan SG, Curhan GC, Eavey R. Change in prevalence of hearing loss in us adolescents. JAMA 2010; 304: 772 – 778.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTeasdale TW, Sorensen MH. Hearing loss in relation to educational attainment and cognitive abilities: a population study. Int J Audiol 2007; 46: 172 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoodcock K, Pole JD. Educational attainment, labour force status and injury: a comparison of Canadians with and without deafness and hearing loss. Int J Rehabil Res 2008; 31: 297 – 304.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
lary24336.pdf
Size:
200.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.