View Item 

Show simple item record

Patient selection for left ventricular assist devices

dc.contributor.authorLund, Lars H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMatthews, Jenniferen_US
dc.contributor.authorAaronson, Keithen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-11T17:57:14Z
dc.date.available2014-02-11T17:57:14Z
dc.date.issued2010-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationLund, Lars H.; Matthews, Jennifer; Aaronson, Keith (2010). "Patient selection for left ventricular assist devices." European Journal of Heart Failure 12(5): 434-443. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102692>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1388-9842en_US
dc.identifier.issn1879-0844en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102692
dc.publisherElsevier Incen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherAdvanced Heart Failureen_US
dc.subject.otherPatient Selectionen_US
dc.subject.otherHeart Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherMechanical Circulatory Supporten_US
dc.subject.otherLeft Ventricular Assist Deviceen_US
dc.titlePatient selection for left ventricular assist devicesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelCardiovascular Medicineen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid20172939en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102692/1/ejhfhfq006.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/eurjhf/hfq006en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEuropean Journal of Heart Failureen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSantambrogio L Bianchi T Fuardo M Gazzoli F Veronesi R Braschi A Maurelli M Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device insertion: preoperative risk factors Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2006 5 379 382en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReedy JE Swartz MT Termuhlen DF Pennington DG McBride LR Miller LW Ruzevich SA Bridge to heart transplantation: importance of patient selection J Heart Transplant 1990 9 473 480 Discussion 480‐471en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSandner SE Zimpfer D Zrunek P Rajek A Schima H Dunkler D Grimm M Wolner E Wieselthaler GM Renal function and outcome after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation Ann Thorac Surg 2009 87 1072 1078en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSandner SE Zimpfer D Zrunek P Rajek A Schima H Dunkler D Zuckermann AO Wieselthaler GM Age and outcome after continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device implantation as bridge to transplantation J Heart Lung Transplant 2009 28 367 372en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatthews JC Dardas TF Koelling TM Pagani FD Aaronson KD LVAD risk prediction models: the value of getting another opinion. (Abstract 400) J Heart Lung Transplant 2008 27 S205en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrewer RJ Morgan JA Nemeh H Williams C Czerska B Tita C Drost C Smith C Chernich J Lanfear D Persistent right ventricular failure after LVAD implantation for bridge‐to‐transplant does not reduce survival to transplantation J Card Fail 2009 15 S47en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatrick JE Miller LW Boyce SW Improved survival with simultaneous RVAD placement in LVAD recipients at high risk for RV failure J Heart Lung Transplant 2009 28 S209en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFitzpatrick JR 3rd Frederick JR Hiesinger W Hsu VM McCormick RC Kozin ED Laporte CM O'Hara ML Howell E Dougherty D Cohen JE Southerland KW Howard JL Paulson EC Acker MA Morris RJ Woo YJ Early planned institution of biventricular mechanical circulatory support results in improved outcomes compared with delayed conversion of a left ventricular assist device to a biventricular assist device J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009 137 971 977en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHill JD Farrar DJ Naka Y Chen JM Portner PM Loisance D Frazier O Kirklin J Positive displacement ventricular assist devices ISHLT Monograph Series 1, Mechanical Circulatory Support 2006 Elsevier Inc 53 75en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarrar DJ Hill JD Pennington DG McBride LR Holman WL Kormos RL Esmore D Gray LA Jr Seifert PE Schoettle GP Moore CH Hendry PJ Bhayana JN Preoperative and postoperative comparison of patients with univentricular and biventricular support with the thoratec ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997 113 202 209en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceINTERMACS http://www.uab.edu/ctsresearch/intermacs/presentations_part2.htm (14 September 2009)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKormos RL Teuteberg J Russell SD Massey T Feldman D Moazami N Farrar C Milano C Right ventricular failure (RVF) in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). (Abstract 203) J Heart Lung Transplant 2008 27 S134en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMokadam NA Ewald GA Damiano RJ Jr Moazami N Deterioration and mortality among patients with United Network for Organ Sharing status 2 heart disease: caution must be exercised in diverting organs J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006 131 925 926en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrazier OH Myers TJ Westaby S Gregoric ID Use of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist system as a bridge to heart transplantation or as destination therapy for patients with chronic heart failure Ann Surg 2003 237 631 636 Discussion 636‐637en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStevenson LW Clinical use of inotropic therapy for heart failure: looking backward or forward? Part II: chronic inotropic therapy Circulation 2003 108 492 497en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUpadya S Lee FA Saldarriaga C Verma S Sedrakyan A Nystrom K Katz SD Home continuous positive inotropic infusion as a bridge to cardiac transplantation in patients with end‐stage heart failure J Heart Lung Transplant 2004 23 466 472en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZemljic G Bunc M Yazdanbakhsh AP Vrtovec B Levosimendan improves renal function in patients with advanced chronic heart failure awaiting cardiac transplantation J Card Fail 2007 13 417 421en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgan JA John R Rao V Weinberg AD Lee BJ Mazzeo PA Flannery MR Chen JM Oz MC Naka Y Bridging to transplant with the HeartMate left ventricular assist device: The Columbia Presbyterian 12‐year experience J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004 127 1309 1316en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAaronson KD Eppinger MJ Dyke DB Wright S Pagani FD Left ventricular assist device therapy improves utilization of donor hearts J Am Coll Cardiol 2002 39 1247 1254en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBank AJ Mir SH Nguyen DQ Bolman RM 3rd Shumway SJ Miller LW Kaiser DR Ormaza SM Park SJ Effects of left ventricular assist devices on outcomes in patients undergoing heart transplantation Ann Thorac Surg 2000 69 1369 1374 Discussion 1375en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBhat G Predictors of clinical outcome in advanced heart failure patients on continuous intravenous milrinone therapy ASAIO J 2006 52 677 681en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLe Gall JR Lemeshow S Saulnier F A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study JAMA 1993 270 2957 2963en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLund LH Mancini D Heart failure in women Med Clin North Am 2004 88 1321 1345, xiien_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeng MC Orthotopic heart transplantation: highlights and limitations Surg Clin North Am 2004 84 243 255en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWarner‐Stevenson L Frazier O Kirklin J The evolving role of mechanical circulatory support in advanced heart failure ISHLT Monograph Series 1, Mechanical Circulatory Support 2006 Elsevier Inc p181 203en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLietz K Long JW Kfoury AG Slaughter MS Silver MA Milano CA Rogers JG Naka Y Mancini D Miller LW Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post‐REMATCH era: implications for patient selection Circulation 2007 116 497 505en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRose EA Gelijns AC Moskowitz AJ Heitjan DF Stevenson LW Dembitsky W Long JW Ascheim DD Tierney AR Levitan RG Watson JT Meier P Ronan NS Shapiro PA Lazar RM Miller LW Gupta L Frazier OH Desvigne‐Nickens P Oz MC Poirier VL Long‐term mechanical left ventricular assistance for end‐stage heart failure N Engl J Med 2001 345 1435 1443en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRogers JG Butler J Lansman SL Gass A Portner PM Pasque MK Pierson RN 3rd Chronic mechanical circulatory support for inotrope‐dependent heart failure patients who are not transplant candidates: results of the INTrEPID Trial J Am Coll Cardiol 2007 50 741 747en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor DO Edwards LB Boucek MM Trulock EP Aurora P Christie J Dobbels F Rahmel AO Keck BM Hertz MI Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty‐fourth official adult heart transplant report‐2007 J Heart Lung Transplant 2007 26 769 781en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRussell SD Miller LW Pagani FD Advanced heart failure: a call to action Congest Heart Fail 2008 14 316 321en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencehttp://www.thoratec.com/medical‐professionals/vad‐product‐information/heartmate‐ll‐lvad.aspx (26 October 2009)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmmar KA Jacobsen SJ Mahoney DW Kors JA Redfield MM Burnett JC Jr Rodeheffer RJ Prevalence and prognostic significance of heart failure stages: application of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association heart failure staging criteria in the community Circulation 2007 115 1563 1570en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaughman KL Jarcho JA Bridge to life—cardiac mechanical support N Engl J Med 2007 357 846 849en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHutchinson J Scott DA Clegg AJ Loveman E Royle P Bryant J Colquitt JL Cost‐effectiveness of left ventricular‐assist devices in end‐stage heart failure Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2008 6 175 185en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDickstein K Cohen‐Solal A Filippatos G McMurray JJ Ponikowski P Poole‐Wilson PA Stromberg A van Veldhuisen DJ Atar D Hoes AW Keren A Mebazaa A Nieminen M Priori SG Swedberg K ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008 The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) Eur J Heart Fail 2008 10 933 989en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHunt SA Abraham WT Chin MH Feldman AM Francis GS Ganiats TG Jessup M Konstam MA Mancini DM Michl K Oates JA Rahko PS Silver MA Stevenson LW Yancy CW 2009 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Circulation 2009 119 e391 e479en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAaronson KD Patel H Pagani FD Patient selection for left ventricular assist device therapy Ann Thorac Surg 2003 75 Suppl. 6 S29 S35en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStevenson LW Shekar P Ventricular assist devices for durable support Circulation 2005 112 e111 e115en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePotapov EV Loforte A Weng Y Jurmann M Pasic M Drews T Loebe M Hennig E Krabatsch T Koster A Lehmkuhl HB Hetzer R Experience with over 1000 implanted ventricular assist devices J Card Surg 2008 23 185 194en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldstein DJ Oz MC Rose EA Implantable left ventricular assist devices N Engl J Med 1998 339 1522 1533en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeng MC Edwards LB Hertz MI Rowe AW Keck BM Kormos R Naftel DC Kirklin JK Taylor DO Mechanical circulatory support device database of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: third annual report‐2005 J Heart Lung Transplant 2005 24 1182 1187en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceINTERMACS http://www.uab.edu/ctsresearch/intermacs/statisticalsummaries.htm (26 October 2009)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBirks EJ Tansley PD Hardy J George RS Bowles CT Burke M Banner NR Khaghani A Yacoub MH Left ventricular assist device and drug therapy for the reversal of heart failure N Engl J Med 2006 355 1873 1884en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMancini DM Beniaminovitz A Levin H Catanese K Flannery M DiTullio M Savin S Cordisco ME Rose E Oz M Low incidence of myocardial recovery after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with chronic heart failure Circulation 1998 98 2383 2389en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaybaum S Mancini D Xydas S Starling RC Aaronson K Pagani FD Miller LW Margulies K McRee S Frazier OH Torre‐Amione G Cardiac improvement during mechanical circulatory support: a prospective multicenter study of the LVAD Working Group Circulation 2007 115 2497 2505en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiden H Karason K Bergh CH Nilsson F Koul B Wiklund L The feasibility of left ventricular mechanical support as a bridge to cardiac recovery Eur J Heart Fail 2007 9 525 530en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLund LH Aaronson KD Mancini DM Validation of peak exercise oxygen consumption and the Heart Failure Survival Score for serial risk stratification in advanced heart failure Am J Cardiol 2005 95 734 741en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMehra MR Kobashigawa J Starling R Russell S Uber PA Parameshwar J Mohacsi P Augustine S Aaronson K Barr M Listing criteria for heart transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for the care of cardiac transplant candidates—2006 J Heart Lung Transplant 2006 25 1024 1042en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHunt SA Abraham WT Chin MH Feldman AM Francis GS Ganiats TG Jessup M Konstam MA Mancini DM Michl K Oates JA Rahko PS Silver MA Stevenson LW Yancy CW Antman EM Smith SC Jr Adams CD Anderson JL Faxon DP Fuster V Halperin JL Hiratzka LF Jacobs AK Nishimura R Ornato JP Page RL Riegel B ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society Circulation 2005 112 e154 e235en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsmore D Kaye D Spratt P Larbalestier R Ruygrok P Tsui S Meyers D Fiane AE Woodard J A prospective, multicenter trial of the VentrAssist left ventricular assist device for bridge to transplant: safety and efficacy J Heart Lung Transplant 2008 27 579 588en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrazier OH Rose EA Oz MC Dembitsky W McCarthy P Radovancevic B Poirier VL Dasse KA Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate vented electric left ventricular assist system in patients awaiting heart transplantation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001 122 1186 1195en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller LW Pagani FD Russell SD John R Boyle AJ Aaronson KD Conte JV Naka Y Mancini D Delgado RM MacGillivray TE Farrar DJ Frazier OH Use of a continuous‐flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation N Engl J Med 2007 357 885 896en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNavia J McCarthy P Young J Mechanical circulatory support Heart Failure: A Combined Medical and Surgical Approach 2007 Malden, MA Blackwell Futura 380 pp, ISBN: 978‐1‐4051‐2203‐0en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDandel M Weng Y Siniawski H Potapov E Drews T Lehmkuhl HB Knosalla C Hetzer R Prediction of cardiac stability after weaning from left ventricular assist devices in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy Circulation 2008 118 Suppl. 14 S94 S105en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGronda E Bourge RC Costanzo MR Deng M Mancini D Martinelli L Torre‐Amione G O'Hara ML Chambers S Heart rhythm considerations in heart transplant candidates and considerations for ventricular assist devices: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for the care of cardiac transplant candidates—2006 J Heart Lung Transplant 2006 25 1043 1056en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKamiya H Koch A Sack FU Akhyari P Remppis A Dengler TJ Karck M Lichtenberg A Who needs ‘bridge’ to transplantation in the presence of the Eurotransplant high‐urgency heart transplantation program? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008 34 1129 1133 Discussion 1134‐1125en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStewart GC Brooks K Pratibhu PP Tsang SW Semigran MJ Smith CM Saniuk C Camuso JM Fang JC Mudge GH Couper GS Baughman KL Stevenson LW Thresholds of physical activity and life expectancy for patients considering destination ventricular assist devices J Heart Lung Transplant 2009 28 863 869en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams M Casher J Joshi N Hankinson T Warren M Oz M Naka Y Mancini D Insertion of a left ventricular assist device in patients without thorough transplant evaluations: a worthwhile risk? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003 126 436 441en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceINTERMACS http://www.intermacs.org (07 September 2009)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStevenson LW Pagani FD Young JB Jessup M Miller L Kormos RL Naftel DC Ulisney K Desvigne‐Nickens P Kirklin JK INTERMACS profiles of advanced heart failure: the current picture J Heart Lung Transplant 2009 28 535 541en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrazier OH Rose EA McCarthy P Burton NA Tector A Levin H Kayne HL Poirier VL Dasse KA Improved mortality and rehabilitation of transplant candidates treated with a long‐term implantable left ventricular assist system Ann Surg 1995 222 327 336 Discussion 336‐328en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSayer G Naka Y Jorde UP Ventricular assist device therapy Cardiovasc Ther 2009 27 140 150en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePal JD Klodell CT John R Pagani FD Rogers JG Farrar DJ Milano CA Low operative mortality with implantation of a continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device and impact of concurrent cardiac procedures Circulation 2009 120 Suppl. 11 S215 S219en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLahpor J Khaghani A Hetzer R Pavie A Friedrich I Sander K Struber M European results with a continuous‐flow ventricular assist device for advanced heart‐failure patients Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010 37 357 361en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePagani FD Miller LW Russell SD Aaronson KD John R Boyle AJ Conte JV Bogaev RC MacGillivray TE Naka Y Mancini D Massey HT Chen L Klodell CT Aranda JM Moazami N Ewald GA Farrar DJ Frazier OH Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous‐flow rotary left ventricular assist device J Am Coll Cardiol 2009 54 312 321en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolman WA Kirklin JK Frazier OH Kirklin JK Outcomes after mechanical circulatory support ISHLT Monograph Series 2006 137 154en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolman WL Pae WE Teutenberg JJ Acker MA Naftel DC Sun BC Milano CA Kirklin JK INTERMACS: interval analysis of registry data J Am Coll Surg 2009 208 755 761 Discussion 761‐752en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldstein DJ Worldwide experience with the MicroMed DeBakey Ventricular Assist Device as a bridge to transplantation Circulation 2003 108 Suppl. 1 II272 II277en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersen M Videbaek R Boesgaard S Sander K Hansen PB Gustafsson F Incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients on long‐term support with a continuous‐flow assist device (HeartMate II) J Heart Lung Transplant 2009 28 733 735en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZiv O Dizon J Thosani A Naka Y Magnano AR Garan H Effects of left ventricular assist device therapy on ventricular arrhythmias J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 45 1428 1434en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOz MC Rose EA Slater J Kuiper JJ Catanese KA Levin HR Malignant ventricular arrhythmias are well tolerated in patients receiving long‐term left ventricular assist devices J Am Coll Cardiol 1994 24 1688 1691en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaj‐Yahia S Birks EJ Rogers P Bowles C Hipkins M George R Amrani M Petrou M Pepper J Dreyfus G Khaghani A Midterm experience with the Jarvik 2000 axial flow left ventricular assist device J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007 134 199 203en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeller ED Sorensen EN Haddad M Pierson RN 3rd Johnson FL Brown JM Griffith BP Clinical outcomes are similar in pulsatile and nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device recipients Ann Thorac Surg 2007 83 1082 1088en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegenthaler MP Martin J Pernice K Doenst T Sorg S Trummer G Friesewinkel O Beyersdorf F The Jarvik 2000 is associated with less infections than the HeartMate left ventricular assist device Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003 23 748 754 Discussion 754‐745en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchulman AR Martens TP Christos PJ Russo MJ Comas GM Cheema FH Naseem TM Wang R Idrissi KA Bailey SH Naka Y Comparisons of infection complications between continuous flow and pulsatile flow left ventricular assist devices J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007 133 841 842en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegenthaler MP Westaby S Frazier OH Martin J Banning A Robson D Pepper J Poole‐Wilson P Beyersdorf F Advanced heart failure: feasibility study of long‐term continuous axial flow pump support Eur Heart J 2005 26 1031 1038en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBirks EJ Left ventricular assist devices Heart 2010 96 63 71en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark SJ Tector A Piccioni W Raines E Gelijns A Moskowitz A Rose E Holman W Furukawa S Frazier OH Dembitsky W Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: a new look at survival J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005 129 9 17en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLong JW Kfoury AG Slaughter MS Silver M Milano C Rogers J Delgado R Frazier OH Long‐term destination therapy with the HeartMate XVE left ventricular assist device: improved outcomes since the REMATCH study Congest Heart Fail 2005 11 133 138en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller LW Patient selection for the use of ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation Ann Thorac Surg 2003 75 Suppl. 6 S66 S71en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoebe M Koerner MM Lafuente JA Noon GP Patient selection for assist devices: bridge to transplant Curr Opin Cardiol 2003 18 141 146en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller LW Lietz K Candidate selection for long‐term left ventricular assist device therapy for refractory heart failure J Heart Lung Transplant 2006 25 756 764en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLietz K Miller LW Patient selection for left‐ventricular assist devices Curr Opin Cardiol 2009 24 246 251en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOz MC Goldstein DJ Pepino P Weinberg AD Thompson SM Catanese KA Vargo RL McCarthy PM Rose EA Levin HR Screening scale predicts patients successfully receiving long‐term implantable left ventricular assist devices Circulation 1995 92 Suppl. 9 II169 II173en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRao V Oz MC Flannery MA Catanese KA Argenziano M Naka Y Revised screening scale to predict survival after insertion of a left ventricular assist device J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003 125 855 862en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFitzpatrick JR 3rd Frederick JR Hsu VM Kozin ED O'Hara ML Howell E Dougherty D McCormick RC Laporte CA Cohen JE Southerland KW Howard JL Jessup ML Morris RJ Acker MA Woo YJ Risk score derived from pre‐operative data analysis predicts the need for biventricular mechanical circulatory support J Heart Lung Transplant 2008 27 1286 1292en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatthews JC Koelling TM Pagani FD Aaronson KD The right ventricular failure risk score a pre‐operative tool for assessing the risk of right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device candidates J Am Coll Cardiol 2008 51 2163 2172en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePotapov EV Stepanenko A Dandel M Kukucka M Lehmkuhl HB Weng Y Hennig F Krabatsch T Hetzer R Tricuspid incompetence and geometry of the right ventricle as predictors of right ventricular function after implantation of a left ventricular assist device J Heart Lung Transplant 2008 27 1275 1281en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolman WL Kormos RL Naftel DC Miller MA Pagani FD Blume E Cleeton T Koenig SC Edwards L Kirklin JK Predictors of death and transplant in patients with a mechanical circulatory support device: a multi‐institutional study J Heart Lung Transplant 2009 28 44 50en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlotz S Vahlhaus C Riehl C Reitz C Sindermann JR Scheld HH Pre‐operative prediction of post‐VAD implant mortality using easily accessible clinical parameters J Heart Lung Transplant 2010 29 45 52en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDang NC Topkara VK Mercando M Kay J Kruger KH Aboodi MS Oz MC Naka Y Right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with chronic congestive heart failure J Heart Lung Transplant 2006 25 1 6en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarrar DJ Preoperative predictors of survival in patients with thoratec ventricular assist devices as a bridge to heart transplantation. Thoratec Ventricular Assist Device Principal Investigators J Heart Lung Transplant 1994 13 93 100 Discussion 100‐101en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFukamachi K McCarthy PM Smedira NG Vargo RL Starling RC Young JB Preoperative risk factors for right ventricular failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion Ann Thorac Surg 1999 68 2181 2184en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKavarana MN Pessin‐Minsley MS Urtecho J Catanese KA Flannery M Oz MC Naka Y Right ventricular dysfunction and organ failure in left ventricular assist device recipients: a continuing problem Ann Thorac Surg 2002 73 745 750en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKormos RL Gasior TA Kawai A Pham SM Murali S Hattler BG Griffith BP Transplant candidate's clinical status rather than right ventricular function defines need for univentricular versus biventricular support J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996 111 773 782 Discussion 782‐773en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNakatani S Thomas JD Savage RM Vargo RL Smedira NG McCarthy PM Prediction of right ventricular dysfunction after left ventricular assist device implantation Circulation 1996 94 Suppl. 9 II216 II221en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgan JA John R Lee BJ Oz MC Naka Y Is severe right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device recipients a risk factor for unsuccessful bridging to transplant and post‐transplant mortality Ann Thorac Surg 2004 77 859 863en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOchiai Y McCarthy PM Smedira NG Banbury MK Navia JL Feng J Hsu AP Yeager ML Buda T Hoercher KJ Howard MW Takagaki M Doi K Fukamachi K Predictors of severe right ventricular failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion: analysis of 245 patients Circulation 2002 106 Suppl. 121 I198 I202en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuwanant S Hamilton KK Klodell CT Hill JA Schofield RS Cleeton TS Pauly DF Aranda JM Jr Tricuspid annular motion as a predictor of severe right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation J Heart Lung Transplant 2008 27 1102 1107en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScalia GM McCarthy PM Savage RM Smedira NG Thomas JD Clinical utility of echocardiography in the management of implantable ventricular assist devices J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000 13 754 763en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeng MC Loebe M El‐Banayosy A Gronda E Jansen PG Vigano M Wieselthaler GM Reichart B Vitali E Pavie A Mesana T Loisance DY Wheeldon DR Portner PM Mechanical circulatory support for advanced heart failure: effect of patient selection on outcome Circulation 2001 103 231 237en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlba AC Rao V Ivanov J Ross HJ Delgado DH Usefulness of the INTERMACS scale to predict outcomes after mechanical assist device implantation J Heart Lung Transplant 2009 28 827 833en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceButler J Geisberg C Howser R Portner PM Rogers JG Deng MC Pierson RN 3rd Relationship between renal function and left ventricular assist device use Ann Thorac Surg 2006 81 1745 1751en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCarthy PM Smedira NO Vargo RL Goormastic M Hobbs RE Starling RC Young JB One hundred patients with the HeartMate left ventricular assist device: evolving concepts and technology J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998 115 904 912en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ejhfhfq006.pdf
Size:
272.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.