Show simple item record

The association of the original OSHA chemical hazard communication standard with reductions in acute work injuries/illnesses in private industry and the industrial releases of chemical carcinogens

dc.contributor.authorOleinick, Arthuren_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-11T17:57:24Z
dc.date.available2015-04-01T19:59:07Zen_US
dc.date.issued2014-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationOleinick, Arthur (2014). "The association of the original OSHA chemical hazard communication standard with reductions in acute work injuries/illnesses in private industry and the industrial releases of chemical carcinogens." American Journal of Industrial Medicine 57(2): 138-152.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0271-3586en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0274en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102719
dc.description.abstractBackground OSHA predicted the original chemical Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) would cumulatively reduce the lost workday acute injury/illness rate for exposure events by 20% over 20 years and reduce exposure to chemical carcinogens. Methods JoinPoint trend software identified changes in the rate of change of BLS rates for days away from work for acute injuries/illnesses during 1992–2009 for manufacturing and nonmanufacturing industries for both chemical, noxious or allergenic injury exposure events and All other exposure events. The annual percent change in the rates was used to adjust observed numbers of cases to estimate their association with the standard. A case‐control study of EPA's Toxic Release Inventory 1988–2009 data compared carcinogen and non‐carcinogens' releases. Results The study estimates that the HCS was associated with a reduction in the number of acute injuries/illnesses due to chemical injury exposure events over the background rate in the range 107,569–459,395 (Hudson method/modified BIC model) depending on whether the HCS is treated as a marginal or sole factor in the decrease. Carcinogen releases have declined at a substantially faster rate than control non‐carcinogens. Discussion The previous HCS standard was associated with significant reductions in chemical event acute injuries/illnesses and chemical carcinogen exposures. Am. J. Ind. Med. 57:138–152, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherSignature Publicationsen_US
dc.subject.otherJoinPoint Regressionen_US
dc.subject.otherOSHA Standardsen_US
dc.subject.otherChemical Hazardsen_US
dc.subject.otherChemical Releasesen_US
dc.subject.otherEpidemiologyen_US
dc.titleThe association of the original OSHA chemical hazard communication standard with reductions in acute work injuries/illnesses in private industry and the industrial releases of chemical carcinogensen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102719/1/ajim22269.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ajim.22269en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInternational Agency Research for on Cancer (IARC). 1995. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk to humans. Dry cleaning, some chlorinated solvents and other industrial chemicals. Vol. 63. Lyon, France: World Health Organization.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInd. Union (Industrial Union Department, AFL‐CIO v. American Petroleum Institute). 1980b. 448U. S.607, 656.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim H, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. 2000. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with application to cancer rates. Stat Med 19: 335 – 351.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim H, Fay MP, Yu B, Barrett MJ, Feuer EJ. 2004. Comparability of segmented line regression models. Biometrics 60 ( 4 ): 1005 – 1014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMendeloff J, Gray WB. 2005. Inside the black box: How do OSHA inspections lead to reductions in workplace injuries ? Law Policy 27: 219 – 237.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Cancer Institute (NCI). 2013a. Surveillance Research: Joinpoint regression program. http://surveillance.cancer.gov/joinpoint.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Cancer Institute (NCI). 2013b. Statistical methodology and applications branch and data modeling branch. Joinpoint regression program. Version 4.0.4 (May, 3013). Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute. https://surveillance.cancer.gov/joinpoint/download.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelson NA, Kaufman J, Kalat J, Silverstein B. 1997. Falls in construction: Injury rates for OSHA‐inspected employers before and after citation for violating the Washington State fall protection standard. Am J Ind Med 31: 296 – 302.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Institute Occupational of Safety Health (NIOSH). 2011. Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS). http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/rtecs/RTECSfeatures.html.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Library of Medicine (NLM). 2012. Hazardous Substances Data Bank in TOXNET. http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi‐bin/sis/htmlgen?HSDB.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Toxicology Program (NTP). 2011. Report on Carcinogens.12th Edition. Public Health Service. U.S. DHHS. http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/roc12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOleinick A, Zaidman B. 2004. Methodologic issues in the use of workers' compensation databases for the study of injuries with days away from work. I. Sensitivity of case ascertainment. Am J Ind Med 45: 260 – 274.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOleinick A, Zaidman B., 2010a The law and incomplete database information as confounders in epidemiologic research on occupational injuries and illnesses. Am J Ind Med 53: 23 – 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOleinick A, Zaidman B. 2010b. The need for data harmonization—A response to Boden and Ozonoff. Am J Ind Med 53: 854 – 855.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOSHA. 1987. Office of Regulatory Analysis. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 1987. Preliminary regulatory impact and regulatory flexibility analysis of the proposed revision in the Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). II. Benefits @II‐2. U.S. Department of Labor. Document ID: OSHA‐H022D‐2006‐0913—0232. http://www.regulations.gov.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOSHA. 1988. Office of Health Compliance Assistance. OSHA Instruction CPL 2‐2.38B. Appendix: Carcinogen Labelling (same in CPL 2.38C, effective October 22, 1990; CPL 02‐02‐038 (2.38D), effective March 20, 1998) http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=DIRECTIVES&p_id=1551.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOSHA. 2004. Directive CPL 02‐00‐135 at general guidance: Chapter 5, Question 5 (December 30, 2004). http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=DIRECTIVES&p_id=3205.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePolicy Planning Evaluation, Inc. (PPE). 2009. Revised final report. Data and analysis in support of an economic analysis of proposed. changes to the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard. Herndon, VA: http://www.regulations.gov/#!searchResults;rpp=10;po=0;s=OSHA‐H022K‐2006‐0062‐0550.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. 2008. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuser J, Wiatrowski W. 2013. Restricted work due to workplace injuries: A historical perspective. Mon Labor Rev 13 ( 3 ): 31 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchoen RE, et al. 2012. Colorectal‐cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med 366: 2345 – 2357.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbraham KG, Weber WL, Personick ME. 1996. Improvements in the BLS safety and health statistical system. Mon Labor Rev 119 ( 4 ): 3 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Conference Governmental of Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). 2009. TLVs© and BEIs©. (Based on the documentation of the Threshold Limit Values for chemical substances and physical agents & Biological Exposure Indices). Cincinnati, OH: Signature Publications.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAFL‐CIO (AFL‐CIO v. OSHA). 1992. 965 F2d. 962 (CA3).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAm Textile (American Textile Mfrs. v. Donovan). 1981. 452 U.S. 490, 506 n.25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson RN, Minino AM, Hoyert DL, Rosenberg HM. 2001. Comparability of cause of death between ICD‐9 and ICD‐10: Preliminary estimates. Natl Vital Stat Rep 49 ( 2 ): 1 – 32. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr49/nvsr49_02.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArfe A, Malvezzi M, Bertuccio P, Decarli A, Vecchia CL, Negri E. 2011. Cancer mortality trend analysis in Italy, 1970–2007. Eur J Cancer Prev 20 ( 5 ): 364 – 374.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaggs J, Silverstein B, Foley M. 2003. Workplace health and safety regulations: Impact of enforcement and consultation on workers' compensation claim rates in Washington State. Am J Ind Med 43: 483 – 494.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBena JF, Bailer AJ, Loomis D, Richardson D, Marshall S. 2004. Effects of data limitations when modeling fatal occupational injury rates. Am J Ind Med 46: 271 – 283.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertke SJ, Meyers AR, Wurzelbacher SJ, Bell J, Lampl ML, Robins D. 2012. Development and evaluation of a Naïve Bayesian model for coding causation of workers' compensation claims. J Saf Res 43 ( 5–6 ): 327 – 332.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBureau of Statistics (BLS), Labor. 2002. Lost‐worktime injuries and illnesses: Characteristics and resulting days away from work, 2002. http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/case/osnr0019.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2003. Lost‐worktime injuries and illnesses: Characteristics and resulting days away from work, 2003. http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/case/osnr0022.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2007. Occupational illness and injury classification manual. Version 1.0 (1992 as revised). http://www.bls.gov/iif/oiics_manual_2007.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2009a. Table R33. Number of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses involving days away from work by event or exposure leading to injury or illness and selected sources of injury or illness, 2007. http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/case/ostb1975.pdf (same table number previous reports).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2009b. Table R27. Number of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses involving days away from work by source of injury or illness and selected events or exposures leading to injury or illness, 2007. http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/case/ostb 1969.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2009c. Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses requiring days away from work, 2009. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/osh2_11092010.htm.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2010. Issues in Labor Statistics. Sizing up the 2007–2009 recession: Comparing two key labor market indicators with earlier downturns. Issues in Labor Statistics: December: Summary 10–11: 1–6. http://www.bls.gov/opub/ils/pdf/opbils88.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2011. Nonfatal injuries and illnesses requiring days away from work, 2011. http://www/bls.gov/news.release/archives/osh2_11082012.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2011b. Injuries, illnesses and fatalities. www.bls.gov/iif.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2013. Injuries, illnesses and fatalities: IIF Databases. http://www.bls.gov/iif/#data.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoden LI. 2013. Capture‐recapture estimates of the undercount of workplace injuries and illnesses: Sensitivity analysis. Am J Ind Med (Early view).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoden LI, Ozonoff A. 2008. Capture‐recapture estimates of nonfatal workplace injuries and illnesses. Ann Epidemiol 18: 500 – 506.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoden LI, Ozonoff AI. 2010. Researcher judgment and study design: Challenges of using Administrative data. Am J Ind Med 53: 37 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCanadian Centre Occupational for Safety Health (CCOSH). 2013. http://ccinfoweb.ccohs.ca/rtecs/search.html.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control Prevention (CDC). 2011. International classification of diseases, 9th revision. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd.htm.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChemical, Engineering News (CEN). Top 50 chemicals production … (propylene oxide). Available at ProQuest, a commercial online database.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCode of Federal Regulations (CFR). 2012a. 29 C.F.R. 1910.1001 et seq. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR‐2012‐title29‐vol6/pdf/CFR‐2012‐title29‐vol6‐part1910‐subpartZ.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCode of Federal Regulations (CFR). 2012b. 29 C.F.R. 1910.119 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR‐2012‐title29‐vol5/xml/CFR‐2012‐title29‐vol5‐sec 1910‐1119.xml.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCode of Federal Regulations (CFR). 2012c. 29 C.F.R. 1910.1000 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR‐2012‐title29‐vol6/xml/CFR‐2012‐title29‐vol6‐sec 1910‐119.xml.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCode of Federal Regulations (CFR). 2012d. 29 C.F.R. 1910.1200 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR‐2012‐title29‐vol6/xml/CFR‐2012‐title29‐vol6‐sec 1910‐1200.xml.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCode of Federal Regulations (CFR). 2012e. 29 C.F.R. 1910.147 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR‐2012‐title29‐vol5/xml/CFR‐2012‐title29‐vol5‐sec 1910‐147.xml.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCode of Federal Regulations (CFR). 2012f. 29 C.F.R. 1926.502. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR‐2012‐title29‐vol8/pdf/CFR‐2012‐title29‐vol8‐sec 1926‐502.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen H‐S, Portier K, Ghosh K, Naishadham D, Kim H‐J, Zhu L, Pickle LW, Krapcho M, Scoppa S, Jemal A, Feuer E. 2012. Predicting US‐ and state‐level cancer counts for the current calendar year. Part I: Evaluation of temporal projection methods for mortality. Cancer 118: 1091 – 1099.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCMR, Chemical Market Report, later ICIS Chemical Business Americas. Chemical profile (for different chemicals). Available at ProQuest.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCode (United States Code). 2011a. U.S.C. 655(b)(5). http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCode (United States Code). 2011b. 29 U.S.C. 655(b)(2)‐(4), see 2011a.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCode (United States Code). 2011c. 29 U.S.C. 655(a).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCode (United States Code). 2011d. 29 U.S.C. 654(a)(1).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCode (United States Code). 2011e. 29 U.S.C. 657(a).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCode (United States Code). 2011f. 29 U.S.C. 657(f).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCode (United States Code). 2011g. 42 U.S.C. 11001–11050.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCode (United States Code). 2011h. 42 U.S.C. 11023(c).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCode (United States Code). 2011i. 15 U.S.C. 2607(b).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCowling DW, Yang J. 2010. Smoking‐attributable cancer mortality in California, 1979–2005. Tob Control 19 (Suppl 1): i62 – i67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2004. Toxic chemical release inventory reporting forms and instructions. 2003 (Revised). Section 313 of the emergency planning and community right‐to‐know act (Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986). http://www.epa.gov/tri/reporting_materials/rfi/ry2003rfi.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2005. Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Basis of OSHA Carcinogens. http://www.epa.gov/tri/trichemicals/OSHA/OSHA_carcinogen_table_2011.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2008. Overview. Office of Pollution Prevention Toxic Laws and Programs. http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/pubs/oppt101‐032008.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2010. List of lists. Consolidated list of chemicals subject to the community right‐to‐know act (EPCRA), comprehensive environmental response, compensation and liability act (CERCLA) and Section 112 of the clean air act. http://www.epa.gov/tri/trichemicals/reg_requirements/list_of_lists_revised_7_26_2011.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2013a. TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory. http://www.epa.gov/existingchemicals/pubs/tscainventory/basic.html.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2013b. TRI explorer release reports. http://iaspubs.epa.gov/triexplorer/tri_release.chemical.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2013c. Chemical data reporting. http://www.epa.gov/oppt/cdr/index.html.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceERG, National Opinion Research Center. 2009. Final report: OSHA data initiative collection quality control: Analysis of audits on CY2006 employer injury and illness recordkeeping. (Also final reports for 1998, 2001, 2004.)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFederal Register (FR). 1983a. 48 Fed.Reg.53280, 53342 (November 25, 1983) Federal Registers before 1994 are available at www.heinonline.org, a subscriber service.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFederal Register (FR). 1983b. 48 Fed Reg 53280, 5332 8 (November 25, 1983).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFederal Register (FR). 1987a. 52 Fed. Reg. 31852, 31880 (August 24, 1987).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFederal Register (FR). 1987b. 52 Fed. Reg. 31852, 31879 (August 24, 1987).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFederal Register (FR). 1997. 62 Fed. Reg. 6434 (February 11, 1997) www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=FR.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFederal Register (FR). 2001. 66 Fed. Reg. 5916, 6083 (January 19, 2001).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFederal Register (FR). 2012a. 77 Fed. Reg. 17574 (March 26,2012).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFederal Register (FR). 2012b. 77 Fed. Reg. 17574, 17584 (March 26, 2012).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrazis HJ, Ilg RE. 2009. Trends in labor force flows during recent recessions. Mon Labor Rev 132 ( 4 ): 3 – 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedman LS, Forst L. 2007. The impact of OSHA recordkeeping regulation changes on occupational injury and illness trends in the US: a time series analysis. Occup Environ Med 64: 454 – 460.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGAO Government Accounting Office. 1992. Briefing report to congressional requesters: Occupational safety and health. Employers experiences in complying with the Hazard Communication Standard. GAO HRD‐92‐63BR. Washington, DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaviland A, Burns R, Gray W, Ruder T, Mendeloff J. 2010. What kinds of injuries do OSHA inspections prevent ? J Saf Res 41: 339 – 345.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInternational Agency Research for on Cancer (IARC). 1987. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk to humans. Overall evaluations of carcinogenicity: An updating of IARC Monographs Volumes 1 to 42. Supplement 7. World Health Organization. Lyon, France. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/PDFs/index.php.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInternational Agency Research for on Cancer (IARC). 1994. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk to humans. Some industrial chemicals. Vol. 60. World Health Organization. Lyon, France.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInternational Agency Research for on Cancer (IARC). 2011. Agents classified by the IARC monographs, Vols. 1–100. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/index.php.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInd. Union (Industrial Union Department, AFL‐CIO v. American Petroleum Institute). 1980a. 448 U.S. 607, 642.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.