Show simple item record

Acceptance of information technology: User acceptance model for expert systems.

dc.contributor.authorSindi, Ahmed Abbasen_US
dc.contributor.advisorLiker, Jeffrey K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:14:07Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:14:07Z
dc.date.issued1992en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9308447en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9308447en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/103308
dc.description.abstractExpert Systems are a type of Information Systems that explicitly embody expert knowledge and provide advice that rivals human experts. These systems pose fundamental challenges for management and may potentially have a profound impact in the workplace. Understanding the role of user acceptance in the process of implementing systems within organizations is of great importance to researchers and practitioners because user acceptance is a pivotal factor in determining the success or failure of the system. Based on the analysis and synthesis of literature that spans several fields, a model is developed to improve our understanding and prediction of user acceptance of Expert Systems. Using the Theory of Reasoned Action as an organizing framework, several hypotheses were developed. A questionnaire was developed to measure the variables and test the hypotheses of the model. Using a sample of 94 users and non-users from two of the largest accounting firms in the U.S., the model was tested using multiple regression techniques. The results confirmed several hypotheses. Intentions were the only determinant of the frequency of system use. Intentions were associated with social norms encouraging system use. Social norms were associated with beliefs regarding management and peer pressure to use the system. Beliefs regarding the impacts of system use on job performance and valued skills were associated with attitudes to use the system. Beliefs regarding the impacts of system use on valued skills were associated with intentions to use the system, controlling for the effect of attitudes. Ease of system use was associated with beliefs of impacts of system use on job performance and on attitudes towards system use. Individual characteristics, other than age, had no significant association with beliefs. Other hypotheses were not confirmed. General attitudes were not found to associate with intentions to use the system, however, cognitive attitudes, a subset of attitudes, were found to associate with intentions to use the system. The data show that the much anticipated fearful reactions by employees did not materialize. The findings are also consistent with the view that the role of attitudes and social norms in influencing use and intentions depends on the degree of volitional control over the behavior. The model may also be used as a useful tool to understand the process of user acceptance for technologies that pose challenges similar to the ones posed by Expert Systems.en_US
dc.format.extent232 p.en_US
dc.subjectBusiness Administration, Managementen_US
dc.subjectEngineering, Industrialen_US
dc.titleAcceptance of information technology: User acceptance model for expert systems.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineIndustrial and Operations Engineeringen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/103308/1/9308447.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9308447.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.