Show simple item record

Re-forming student literacy: Informing teacher-research.

dc.contributor.authorFleischer, Cathy Annen_US
dc.contributor.advisorRobinson, Jay L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:15:16Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:15:16Z
dc.date.issued1990en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9034421en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9034421en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/103483
dc.description.abstractTeacher-research, an increasingly popular approach to research in composition studies, finds itself in a dilemma at present. The very nature of teacher-research emphasizes the connections between teachers and students in the classroom, context-full studies composed in narrative or descriptive renditions. However, the language and the genres which continue to control the creation of knowledge in composition are those of the psycho-statistical research paradigm, decontextualized studies which rely on a split between the researcher and the researched, in which those who are researched become the object of study. Teacher-researchers who try to take on the familiar language and forms of the psycho-statistical tradition even as they maintain their context-full perspectives find themselves caught between two worlds and unable to satisfy the demands of either one. This dissertation traces the development of its author, a teacher-researcher who was caught in this dilemma as she attempted to study how students perceive their own literacy and their literacy instruction. As readers move with the author through her descriptions of the program of reading and the practical application of issues of literacy and teacher-research in which she was engaged over the four years of this study, they will also move through an argument for the practice of teacher-researcher that rejects the psycho-statistical tradition and locates its roots in other traditions more compatible with its aims and ends. The development becomes clear through the four case studies, each a rendition of students' understandings as they come to form and re-form their own perceptions of their literacy. These case studies, read in conjunction with their postscripts that provide segues between them, comment on the kind of research employed and reflect the author's growth as a researcher, showing her reading into and application of several research traditions other than the psycho-statistical one. In particular, the study shows the influences of ethnography, of critical educational theory, of phenomenological pedagogy and of feminist studies. Ultimately, the author calls for an approach to research growing out of these various traditions, one which accomplishes three goals: research which is based in local knowledge and individual experiences, research which is collaboratively conceived and practiced, and research which has emancipatory action as its necessary end. In keeping with these named goals, the final chapter is composed with two students, each of whom writes extensively about his or her role in the research and the changes this study has effected in their lives as student writers.en_US
dc.format.extent261 p.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Language and Literatureen_US
dc.subjectEducation, Curriculum and Instructionen_US
dc.titleRe-forming student literacy: Informing teacher-research.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEnglish and Educationen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/103483/1/9034421.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9034421.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.