Show simple item record

Behavior and performance of gypsy moth in multiple host situations.

dc.contributor.authorStoyenoff, Jennifer Lynnen_US
dc.contributor.advisorWitter, John A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:15:21Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:15:21Z
dc.date.issued1993en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9319637en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9319637en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/103498
dc.description.abstractBecause many gypsy moths may experience multiple species diets in nature, I studied performance and behavior of gypsy moths in multiple host situations in Michigan. I examined effects of host switching on insect performance, utilizing diets which were combinations of red and white oaks and bigtooth and trembling aspens. Conclusions include: (1) Insects performed best on a first host of red oak and most poorly on a first host of bigtooth aspen. (2) Insects did not uniformly perform better or worse on multiple species diets than on single species diets. (3) Both first and second host species affect insect performance; some aspects of performance are affected more strongly by the first host and some by the second host. (4) Insects performed best on a second host of trembling aspen. Performance also was investigated in relation to egg hatch/feeding initiation times over a 3 week period. Insects placed on trees earliest had highest mortality, slowest development, and lowest larval weights late in the season, while those placed 3 weeks later had lowest mortality, fastest development, and heaviest larval weights throughout the season. Nutritional indices were examined for fourth and fifth instar gypsy moths fed sequential diets. Combinations were formed from northern pin and white oaks and bigtooth and trembling aspens. Indices were evaluated under field conditions. Conclusions include: (1) Insects eating northern pin oak before the switch performed best after the switch. (2) Insects grew best on a second host of trembling aspen despite mediocre to low food conversion efficiencies; low efficiencies were offset by high consumption rates. (3) Insects did not consume more, grow faster, or use food more efficiently when the second host was either the same species as the rearing plant or closely related to it. Food choices of older gypsy moths in multiple species situations were evaluated by caging larvae on intermingled foliage of host trees. Species pairs tested were northern pin oak/white oak, northern pin oak/bigtooth aspen, white oak/bigtooth aspen, and witch-hazel/bigtooth aspen. Findings include: (1) Early experience on northern pin oak did not uniformly affect later choices of insects. (2) Insects distinguished strongly between congeneric species. (3) Insects strongly avoided white oak. (4) Insects switched between available diet items but frequency of movement was not high.en_US
dc.format.extent159 p.en_US
dc.subjectBiology, Ecologyen_US
dc.subjectBiology, Entomologyen_US
dc.subjectAgriculture, Forestry and Wildlifeen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Sciencesen_US
dc.titleBehavior and performance of gypsy moth in multiple host situations.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/103498/1/9319637.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9319637.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.