Show simple item record

Nitrogen cycling in shaded and unshaded coffee plantations in the Central Valley of Costa Rica.

dc.contributor.authorBabbar, Liana Inesen_US
dc.contributor.advisorZak, Donald R.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorVandermeer, John H.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorRichter, Daniel D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:15:41Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:15:41Z
dc.date.issued1993en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9332014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9332014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/103544
dc.description.abstractCoffee (Coffee arabica L.) management in Costa Rica is changing from plantations associated with shade trees to monocultures; both of which receive large additions of N through fertilization. Understanding patterns and processes of N cycling within coffee agro-ecosystems could lead to the development of management practices that maintain productivity while minimizing environmental damage. My study investigated the N dynamics in paired shaded and unshaded coffee plantations in the Central Valley, all fertilized with about 300 kg N ha$\sp{-1}$ y$\sp{-1}$. I quantified net N mineralization and nitrification, and microbial biomass N. Mean daily mineralization rates did not significantly differ between treatments (shaded = 38.9 mg N m$\sp{-2}$ d$\sp{-1}$; unshaded = 29.4 mg N m$\sp{-2}$ d$\sp{-1}$). However, net mineralization was significantly higher in shaded plantations (148 kg N ha$\sp{-1}$ y$\sp{-1}$) than in the unshaded (111 kg N ha$\sp{-1}$ y$\sp{-1}$). Small pools of microbial biomass N (shaded = 0.48 g m$\sp{-2}$; unshaded = 0.46 g m$\sp{-2}$) suggested that N retention primarily occurs through plant uptake. I also investigated NO$\sb3\sp-$ leaching and factors controlling denitrification, such as NO$\sb3\sp-$, C, and O$\sb2$ availability. Annual NO$\sb3\sp-$ leaching losses were 3 times greater in unshaded plantations (238 kg NO$\sb3\sp-$-N ha$\sp{-1}$ y$\sp{-1}$) than those in the shaded (87 kg ha$\sp{-1}$ y$\sp{-1}$). In contrast, mean denitrification rates in shaded plantations were 60% higher (6774 ug N$\sb2$O-N g$\sp{-1}$ d$\sp{-1}$) than those in unshaded plantations (4340 ug N$\sb2$O-N g$\sp{-1}$ d$\sp{-1}$). Carbon additions (C$\sb6$ H$\sb{12}$ O$\sb6$) elicited nearly a three-fold increase ($-$C = 2985 ug N$\sb2$O-N g$\sp{-1}$ d$\sp{-1}$ to +C = 8396 ug N$\sb2$O-N g$\sp{-1}$ d$\sp{-1}$) in both agroecosystems. Anaerobic conditions increased denitrification to a lesser extent (+O$\sb2$ = 4331 ug N$\sb2$O-N g$\sp{-1}$ d$\sp{-1}$; $-$O$\sb2$ = 6656 ug N$\sb2$O-N g$\sp{-1}$ d$\sp{-1}$). In both plantation types, potential N loss via denitrification was small compared to NO$\sb3\sp-$ leaching. My results indicate that large N-fertilizer additions are unwarranted measures to sustain high coffee yields. In light of the large N loss through leaching, the presence of shade trees is an important factor reducing N loss.en_US
dc.format.extent86 p.en_US
dc.subjectBiology, Ecologyen_US
dc.subjectAgriculture, Forestry and Wildlifeen_US
dc.titleNitrogen cycling in shaded and unshaded coffee plantations in the Central Valley of Costa Rica.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/103544/1/9332014.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9332014.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.