Show simple item record

Factors influencing rural hospital affiliation with multihospital systems.

dc.contributor.authorWise, Christopher Griffithsen_US
dc.contributor.advisorMick, Stephen S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:16:37Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:16:37Z
dc.date.issued1993en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9332186en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9332186en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/103685
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to determine the combination of environmental and financial performance factors that lead to rural hospital association with multihospital systems. This study is based on data obtained from the Michigan-Johns Hopkins Rural Hospital Survey (MJHRHS), a telephone survey of 797 chief administrators of short-term length-of-stay community rural hospitals combined with secondary data sources from the American Hospital Association, the national Area Resource Files, and HCFA's PPS Medicare Cost Report files. The years 1983 and 1988 were target years of the MJHRHS. Cox's proportional hazard model was used to identify the characteristics of rural hospitals that underwent multihospital system affiliation between 1983 and 1988. Logistic regression was used to compare the characteristics of rural hospitals affiliating with systems under contract managed arrangements and owned/leased/sponsored arrangements. The interaction of financial performance and environmental factors was a critical factor in explaining rural hospital/multihospital system affiliation. Rural hospitals joining non-profit systems possessed poor financial performance and were located in unfavorable environments. Rural hospitals joining for-profit systems also possessed poor financial performance but were located in relatively favorable environments. Mission compatibility was a significant factor for membership with for-profit systems, but not for membership with non-profit systems. Finally, of the rural hospitals that underwent affiliation between 1983-1988, those with poorer financial performance were more likely to affiliate under an owned/leased/sponsored arrangement than a contract managed arrangement. Poorly performing rural hospitals were more likely to undergo system affiliation; further studies should evaluate whether or not the performance of these rural hospitals has improved after affiliation. Also, results indicate important differences between non-profit and for-profit system membership.en_US
dc.format.extent151 p.en_US
dc.subjectHealth Sciences, Health Care Managementen_US
dc.titleFactors influencing rural hospital affiliation with multihospital systems.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHealth Services Organization and Policyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/103685/1/9332186.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9332186.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.