Show simple item record

Hospital wage and administration patterns: A metropolitan Toronto case study.

dc.contributor.authorGamble, Paul Andrew Warrenen_US
dc.contributor.advisorMunson, Fred C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:17:53Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:17:53Z
dc.date.issued1993en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9423036en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9423036en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/103882
dc.description.abstractThe existence of the well documented activities of the local voluntary hospital association in Metropolitan Toronto, Ontario, Canada, with respect to the matter of wage and salary administration patterns provided a unique opportunity to explore a number of integrated elements key to understanding the current wage patterns observed in the Metropolitan Toronto and area hospitals. The research itself utilized the records, reports, minutes, and the wage and salary database maintained by that association, the Hospital Council of Metropolitan Toronto (HCMT), from 1958 to 1988. An initial case study approach revealed that HCMT as an organization, exemplified a political system that utilized a rational tool (i.e., an innovative collective job evaluation exercise), to address its legitimate decision-making requirements. This finding gave evidence to the fact that the organization truly served the interest of its membership while at the same time supported the legitimate survival goals of the association. Individual hospital responses to the recommendations resulting from the job evaluation exercise were then examined from the perspective of organizational attributes. However the research failed to find any significant support for the research hypothesis that response to the collective innovative salary recommendation was positively related to the individual institution's degree of complexity, formalization, organizational slack, size, elite values and teaching affiliation. Finally, to assess the effectiveness of the Ontario legislative approach to pay equity, regression models were developed. The results indicated that the percentage female did have a significant impact on determining the level of compensation for lower ranked hospital based jobs. The policy implications of these findings included the fact that the study did not confirm any perception that a substantial number of female dominated hospital occupations were under compensated according to the principles of comparable worth. In addition, the Ontario pay equity legislation, as currently written, was found to be of limited future value to the sample hospital community.en_US
dc.format.extent157 p.en_US
dc.subjectHealth Sciences, Public Healthen_US
dc.subjectHealth Sciences, Health Care Managementen_US
dc.titleHospital wage and administration patterns: A metropolitan Toronto case study.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameDr.P.H.en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHealth Policyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/103882/1/9423036.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9423036.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.