Show simple item record

A comparison of perceived leadership attributes of women by males and females in education and business.

dc.contributor.authorDaly, Stephanie Mocerien_US
dc.contributor.advisorCollet, LaVerneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:19:02Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:19:02Z
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9500865en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9500865en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/104069
dc.description.abstractThis study examined the acceptance of women in administrative and management roles by exploring gender differences in perceptions of women's suitability for management, characteristics that make them suitable, and aspiration for management positions. In particular, the study focused on how gender differences were affected by the enterprise (business or education) in which the individual worked and his/her role (worker or manager). A total of 1343 men and women from business and education participated in interviews from 1987 through 1993. This study focused on responses to 3 extracted statements on the Structured Interview Questionnaire; the first was concerned with aspiration to a higher position, with the second asking for a rating on women's suitability for leadership, and the third question was a verbal description of attributes associated with women's suitability for leadership. The 1343 participants were divided into eight groups: male and female workers from business and education, and male and female managers from business and education. These groups were the basis of comparisons for the five hypotheses that were developed for this study. A secondary analysis of the original data base created from the interviews was used to test these hypotheses. Four of the five hypotheses were supported indicating that both males and females considered women suitable for leadership and the attributes associated with their suitability were more nurturing than competitive. Females had significantly higher means on Nurturance scores than males in the study. Females had significantly higher means on Suitability scores and aspired to higher positions than the males. The hypothesis was not supported that education would have higher means on Suitability, Nurturing and Aspiration than business. The conclusions that were derived from this study showed that women have become more positively perceived for the management role both in business and education. The study also provided evidence that women are perceived to be nurturing, which is compatible with the participative management philosophy where leaders who display this attribute are preferred. At the same time, women are aspiring to higher positions more than men causing them to successfully prepare and acquire management positions.en_US
dc.format.extent145 p.en_US
dc.subjectBusiness Administration, Managementen_US
dc.subjectEducation, Administrationen_US
dc.titleA comparison of perceived leadership attributes of women by males and females in education and business.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameDoctor of Education (EdD)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducationen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/104069/1/9500865.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9500865.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.