Show simple item record

Determinants of community response to stormwater pollution in an urbanized watershed.

dc.contributor.authorKaufman, Martin Marken_US
dc.contributor.advisorLevine, Jonathanen_US
dc.contributor.advisorNystuen, Johnen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:19:34Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:19:34Z
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9500963en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9500963en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/104150
dc.description.abstractIncreasing federal regulation of stormwater has been accompanied by decreasing amounts of federal aid available for its mitigation. Left to fend for themselves, communities in urbanized watersheds with diverse demographic, environmental, and spatial characteristics are likely to exhibit different levels of response to stormwater pollution. The purpose of this research is to measure community response to stormwater pollution and to identify the factors which influence the variations in response. A general response model is developed to identify the factors influencing variation in community response. Basic constructs of the model use environmental hazard theory, integrated with analysis of community demographic and political forces affecting local government decision processes. Community stormwater response is measured by an index comprised of twelve response indicators. Selection criteria for the response indicators include their effectiveness, variability, and general representation of the spectrum of stormwater response activity. Observable activities are scored progressively based upon their relative ecosystem impacts. Weighted and unweighted indicator scores are computed, with a survey of stormwater experts providing the basis for the weights. The study area is the urbanized River Rouge watershed in southeast Michigan containing forty-eight communities. Data sources include interviews with public officials, staff, and public documents. Results indicate a wide variation in response levels among the selected communities, with the finding that specific planning activities, such as ordinances, may act as catalysts for additional stormwater implementation and monitoring activities. Regression analysis identifies four significant predictors of response at the watershed scale: the mean age of householder over 25, the total tax rate, community type (city or township), and the amount of green staff (presence of recycling coordinators, foresters, or environmental planners). This mix of predictors demonstrates the applicability of hazard theory to stormwater response, as community stormwater response is influenced by the capacity and economic means to effect change--two central constructs of hazard theory. Locally, a case study of two communities suggests that site-specific visual and temporal characteristics of the stormwater hazard influence community involvement and affect the level of stormwater response. Weighted indicators produce a regression model with slightly stronger statistical and interpretive characteristics than unweighted indicators.en_US
dc.format.extent196 p.en_US
dc.subjectGeographyen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectUrban and Regional Planningen_US
dc.titleDeterminants of community response to stormwater pollution in an urbanized watershed.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineUrban Technological and Environmental Planning: Environmental Planningen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/104150/1/9500963.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9500963.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.