Official and popular literacies in the People's Republic of China: A search for shared perspectives.
dc.contributor.author | Imber, Brenda Prouser | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Berlin, Lawrence | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Jackson, Murray | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-02-24T16:19:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-02-24T16:19:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1990 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | (UMI)AAI9023572 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9023572 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/104171 | |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation reconstructs the lexicon of adult literacy education within the linguistic and historical framework of China in light of China's cultural heritage, official policy and popular will. The study describes the present adult literacy situation and reinforces the importance of taking a diachronic, synchronic and ecological view of literacy. The matrices guiding this thesis are the theoretical setting of literacy, the Chinese linguistic and orthographic setting, the historical setting, the modern and contemporary setting. Key research questions are: (1) What are the theoretical perspectives on the nature, value and consequences of literacy in general? (2) What has been the effect of the Chinese linguistic and orthographic setting on literacy in China? (3) What was the historical setting for the "perceived value" of literacy by the government and the people of China? (4) What is the current status of the "perceived value" of literacy in light of China's official policy? The framework for this study was a qualitative perspective, juxtaposing official mandates against descriptions of popular action for the purpose of trying to understand the seeming lack of a shared perspective on the nature and value of literacy in the PRC. Newspaper articles were particularly useful sources of information about desired behaviors from an official perspective and about behaviors that were not in keeping with China's goals of rapid modernization. Unstructured interviews, used primarily to substantiate the information from the newspaper articles, government documents and directives, verified that official and popular perspectives on literacy are at variance, and that within the framework of the present reorientation towards a market economy, official literacy policies receive a great deal of policy and newspaper attention, but in fact receive "benign neglect" in that funding is no longer available for implementation and practice. As of the first half of 1989, the Responsibility System offers opportunity to strike it rich, making the acquisition of the "People's money" a greater popular priority than the acquisition of literacy. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 379 p. | en_US |
dc.subject | Education, Adult and Continuing | en_US |
dc.subject | Education, Reading | en_US |
dc.subject | Political Science, Public Administration | en_US |
dc.title | Official and popular literacies in the People's Republic of China: A search for shared perspectives. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Education | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/104171/1/9023572.pdf | |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of 9023572.pdf : Restricted to UM users only. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.