Show simple item record

Vegetation productivity soil reclamation equations for the North Dakota coal fields.

dc.contributor.authorBurley, Jon Bryanen_US
dc.contributor.advisorFowler, Gary W.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorPolakowski, Kenneth J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:21:27Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:21:27Z
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9527592en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9527592en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/104439
dc.description.abstractThe dissertation addresses the development of an agricultural productivity equation within a landscape planning and modeling context for the North Dakota coal fields in Oliver, Mercer, and Dunn counties. The procedure employed principal component analysis to develop a combined vegetation yield variable from spring wheat, barley, oat, grass/legume, Eastern red cedar, ponderosa pine, green ash, Siberian peashrub, American plum, and common chokecherry. Soil variables were weighted according to a depth weighting formula and then examined in regression analysis to predict vegetation yield. Eleven equations were developed in the study. The coal zone equation was selected as the best equation to predict plant growth in the surface mining portion of the study area (R$\sp2$ = 66.06 and an overall p-value of 0.0001). The regressors included in the coal zone equation were available water holding capacity, percent slope, percent rock fragments, topographic position squared, hydraulic conductivity squared, percent organic matter squared, percent clay times topographic position, available water holding capacity times percent rock fragments, hydraulic conductivity times percent slope, soil reaction times topographic position, electrical conductivity times topographic position, percent organic matter times topographic position, percent organic matter times electrical conductivity, and a Y intercept coefficient. The regression coefficients were stable under bootstrap and jackknife evaluation procedures and worked relatively well with a subsampling procedure. The equation correlated moderately with reclaimed soil field trials. In addition the study identified a set of sandy loam soils conducive for vegetation growth as well as for supporting buildings. As a set of general guidelines, the coal zone equation indicated the most productive soil configurations include a middle topographic position, gentle nearly level slopes, no rock fragments, a soil reaction near 7.5, soil organic matter near 0.75%, 25% clay content, moderate hydraulic conductivity rates, and maximized available water holding capacity. The guidelines and coal zone equation may be employed to assist landscape reclamation planning efforts and can be adopted in regulatory standards to evaluate soil reconstruction profiles.en_US
dc.format.extent162 p.en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture, Agronomyen_US
dc.subjectBiology, Ecologyen_US
dc.subjectGeographyen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Geographyen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectUrban and Regional Planningen_US
dc.titleVegetation productivity soil reclamation equations for the North Dakota coal fields.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineLandscape Architectureen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/104439/1/9527592.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9527592.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.