Show simple item record

Alternative methods for the assessment of oral health status in populations.

dc.contributor.authorBeltran-Aguilar, Eugenio Daviden_US
dc.contributor.advisorEklund, Stephen A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:22:21Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:22:21Z
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9532445en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9532445en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/104574
dc.description.abstractThis investigation tested alternative methods for the estimation of epidemiologic indicators of oral health status among children. The alternative methods included a visual screening performed by a dental hygienist and a registered nurse, and a parent-completed questionnaire. The indicators included dichotomous variables measuring dental caries and treatment needs, presence of sealants, injuries in the anterior teeth, and dental fluorosis. All data were collected during two weeks in April 1994, among pre-school and elementary schoolchildren of Washington Park, a rural school located in Jasper County, Georgia. Both screening and questionnaire findings were compared pairwise with visual-tactile examinations carried out by a calibrated dentist. Validity, represented by sensitivity, specificity and predictive values, was assessed for screening by a dental hygienist, a nurse, and the parent-completed questionnaire. All examiners were assessed for intra-examiner reliability using percent agreement and kappa. Screening obtained indicators of caries and treatment needs with high validity ($>$90% for sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in a sample with 30-40 percent prevalence). Less valid data were obtained for fluorosis, injuries, and presence of sealants. Very little difference in validity was observed between the nurse and the dental hygienist. A relatively high percentage of parents did not know if their children needed fillings (a proxy for untreated decay) (34%), or had received sealants (17%). Only presence of restorations showed valid results in the parent-completed questionnaire. It is concluded that screening using dental hygienists and nurses can provide valid data for surveillance of caries and treatment needs. Training for visual assessment of fluorosis and injuries needs to be improved to diminish the proportion of false negatives. Because a high proportion of parents did not know the oral status of their children, a parent-completed questionnaire has less applicability than visual screening as an oral health surveillance tool.en_US
dc.format.extent267 p.en_US
dc.subjectHealth Sciences, Dentistryen_US
dc.subjectHealth Sciences, Public Healthen_US
dc.titleAlternative methods for the assessment of oral health status in populations.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameDr.P.H.en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineDental Public Healthen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/104574/1/9532445.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9532445.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.