Show simple item record

From gender to class: Inequality in prehistoric Italy.

dc.contributor.authorRobb, John E.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorWright, Henry T.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorYoffee, Normanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:23:08Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:23:08Z
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9542944en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9542944en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/104695
dc.description.abstractCurrent approaches to prehistoric inequality, involving production and accumulation as determinants of stratification, are logically and empirically questionable. This dissertation examines the practice-theory concept of social reproduction as an alternative theoretical framework for understanding inequality. Within this framework, this work addresses the question: what was the nature of inequality in Italy between the Neolithic and the Iron Age? To answer these questions, published archaeological data and original human skeletal data were used to assess several dimensions of inequality. In addition to various osteological conclusions about health and lifestyle, several conclusions about inequality were reached. 1. Burial and settlement data reveal little political hierarchy prior to the Final Bronze Age. 2. Economic data show little centralized production or accumulation of wealth before the Final Bronze Age. Skeletal data suggest economic intensification from the end of the Neolithic, with pastoralism intensified in the Copper Age and plow agriculture in the Bronze Age. Trade in exotic items increased in the Final Neolithic and again in the Late Bronze Age. 3. Based upon art and burial data, symbolic inequality before the Final Bronze Age consisted of gender asymmetry, with weapons, hunting and plowing as symbols of valued male statuses. In the Iron Age, gender symbols were used to express status distinctions as well, creating an ideology of military aristocracy. Inequality in prehistoric Italy thus evolved from ideological to political/ economic forms. In the Copper and Bronze Ages, inequality took the form of an "egalitarian" Big Man style competition for male prestige from which females were excluded. Only in the Final Bronze and Iron Ages did politically stratified patron-client societies arise. Theoretically, this reconstruction demonstrates that the concept of social reproduction resolves several important theoretical problems. It relates social inequality to individuals' strategic choices in pursuing culturally prescribed goals and prestige through conventional institutions. It also helps elucidate how individual actors' decisions can maintain or change a hegemonic cultural system; for instance, Iron Age stratification probably arose through the application of traditional political behaviors--male prestige competition--in novel economic and social circumstances.en_US
dc.format.extent599 p.en_US
dc.subjectAnthropology, Archaeologyen_US
dc.subjectAnthropology, Physicalen_US
dc.titleFrom gender to class: Inequality in prehistoric Italy.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineAnthropologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/104695/1/9542944.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9542944.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.