Show simple item record

Macroeconomic implications of product variety.

dc.contributor.authorAxarloglou, Konstantinos E.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorKimball, Milesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:23:23Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:23:23Z
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9610069en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9610069en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/104736
dc.description.abstractIn the New Keynesian literature on macroeconomic fluctuations, researchers show that profit maximizing firms might not adjust their nominal prices in response to changes in market demand, if the cost of price adjustment appears to be higher than what they incur by leaving their prices unchanged (nominal price rigidities). Also, they show that, under certain conditions, the elasticity of adjusting their relative prices with respect to changes in aggregate output might be small (real price rigidities), which makes nominal price rigidity more plausible. Overall, relatively small costs in price adjustments might cause some inflexibility in nominal prices, which helps in understanding money non-neutrality. The present study contributes to the New Keynesian literature on real price rigidity. Specifically, I study the way companies adjust the number of their product varieties in the market, during the course of the business cycle, and how this influences their pricing policies, and specifically their "desired" price markups. In fact, I show that desired price markups may be countercyclical, due to the fact that market competition is procyclical. Countercyclical desired price markups imply that companies absorb a significant part of the procyclical changes in the marginal cost, through lower price markups, during economic booms, and higher price markups, during economic recessions. Consequently, their sensitivity of not adjusting their relative prices in synchrony with the business cycle is lower than if desired price markups were constant. In the second chapter of the thesis, I formalize the above idea by using Hotelling's model of spatial allocation. In the third chapter, I generalize the same mechanism in the context of both Hotelling's spatial allocation model and the Chamberlinian model of monopolistic competition, by using different technologies. Finally, in chapter four, I test the mechanism I suggest, by using data from a specific market: the market for books in Ann Arbor.en_US
dc.format.extent119 p.en_US
dc.subjectEconomics, Generalen_US
dc.subjectEconomics, Theoryen_US
dc.titleMacroeconomic implications of product variety.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEconomicsen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/104736/1/9610069.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9610069.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.