Show simple item record

Ethnic prejudice(s) as attitudes: An eco-phenomenological view.

dc.contributor.authorLeach, Colin Wayneen_US
dc.contributor.advisorJackson, James S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:23:54Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:23:54Z
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9610179en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9610179en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/104817
dc.description.abstractAn Eco-phenomenological view is offered as an alternative to existing psychological approaches to studying ethnic prejudice(s) as attitudes. Following classical social psychological theory (Asch, 1952; Osgood, Suci, & Tannenbaum, 1957), attitudes are conceptualized as subjective, meaning-based interpretations of ecological experience. Consistent with this perspective a number of attitude dimensions shown to be important to ethnic prejudice are identified in an integrative literature review. These dimensions are brought into a general attitude-based framework based in an application of Ajzen & Fishbein's (1977) principle of correspondence. Specific values, emotions, and beliefs, are causally ordered based on their level of specificity and contextual relevance to outcomes. In addition to the contextual relevance of outcomes, three other levels of ecological context are identified as important determinants of ethnic prejudice: society, outgroup, and social location. Accounting for these contextual factors suggests that there are multiple forms of ethnic prejudice (see Hall, 1980) rather than one universal and unitary phenomenon as is often assumed in psychological approaches. In two studies utilizing parallel experimental surveys, the eco-phenomenological framework was utilized to study ethnic prejudice(s)-as-attitudes. In study 1, ethnic French policy positions and attitudes toward North Africans and Southeast Asians (N = 1,001) were compared. In study 2, ethnic Dutch policy positions and attitudes toward the Turkish and Surinamers (N = 1,006) were compared. In support of the correspondence model, those attitude dimensions corresponding most closely to the policy positions in level of specificity were generally found to be the most important predictors. Results also suggested that both the specific society, target group, and outcome affected the attitudes predictive of policy position. Ethnic prejudice(s) thus appeared to be more contextual than most current psychological approaches allow. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent266 p.en_US
dc.subjectPsychology, Socialen_US
dc.subjectPolitical Science, Generalen_US
dc.subjectSociology, Ethnic and Racial Studiesen_US
dc.titleEthnic prejudice(s) as attitudes: An eco-phenomenological view.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/104817/1/9610179.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9610179.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.