Show simple item record

Domestic institutions, international agendas, and global environmental protection in Japan and Germany.

dc.contributor.authorSchreurs, Miranda Aliceen_US
dc.contributor.advisorCampbell, John C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:26:01Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:26:01Z
dc.date.issued1996en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9635600en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9635600en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/105142
dc.description.abstractThis work focuses on Japanese and German responses to air and atmospheric pollution problems from the period leading up to the first United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in 1972 to the period just after the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in 1992. The dissertation compares and contrasts how Japan and Germany reacted to the emergence of a new more globally-oriented environmental paradigm during this period through case studies of acid rain, stratospheric ozone depletion, and global climate change. The study examines how ideas, institutions, and actors are linked. It argues that Germany's more proactive and Japan's more reactive responses to the emergence of these new environmental policy concerns in the 1980s can be explained by differences in the strength of their environmental movements. In particular, the emergence of a Green Party in Germany strengthened the voice of environmental interests within the political system and helped to push new environmental policy concerns onto the political agenda. In contrast, Japan's environmental movement remained weak and focused on domestic policy concerns. This only changed in the late 1980s when powerful domestic policy actors found it in their best interest to take up global environmental protection as a policy concern. The differences in the strength of Japan's and Germany's environmental policy communities are related to how environmental citizens' movements became institutionalized in the two countries. These differences, however, were not fixed in stone. This work shows that the introduction of new ideas into the political process can change who the actors are that try to influence the policy process and at times, the institutions that mediate their interactions. In Germany, this meant the formation of a more proactive environmental policy community in the early 1980s. In Japan, a similar transformation occurred close to a decade later.en_US
dc.format.extent322 p.en_US
dc.subjectPolitical Science, Generalen_US
dc.subjectPolitical Science, International Law and Relationsen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Sciencesen_US
dc.titleDomestic institutions, international agendas, and global environmental protection in Japan and Germany.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePolitical Scienceen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/105142/1/9635600.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9635600.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.