Show simple item record

The role of familiarity in landscape aesthetics: A study of tallgrass prairie landscapes.

dc.contributor.authorKeane, Timothy Danielen_US
dc.contributor.advisorBrown, Terry J.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorKaplan, Rachelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:26:28Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:26:28Z
dc.date.issued1990en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9116215en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9116215en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/105214
dc.description.abstractThe role of familiarity in aesthetic appreciation of tallgrass prairie landscapes was investigated in two separate studies. In both studies, familiarity was assessed through self-report measures of Experience, Background, and Predisposition. Knowledge, as an additional index of familiarity, was assessed in Study I and manipulated in Study II. The manipulation involved a lecture focussing either on the ecological or the cultural/historical aspects of prairies; a control group received no instruction. Preference was measured by having the participants rate 41 prairie landscape scenes. Analysis of the preference ratings also provided insight into the way participants perceived the prairie landscapes studied. Students in a variety of University courses participated in the studies, with 197 participants in Study I and 204 participants in Study II. The results of both studies were clear in terms of the relationship between familiarity and preference. In both studies those participants with higher Knowledge and Experience levels, rural Background, and Predisposition for prairie and natural settings had significantly higher preferences for prairie scenes than did other participants. Thus, greater familiarity with the prairie landscapes studied predicts greater preference for those landscapes. In terms of perception of prairies, five landscape categories were discerned from analysis of preference ratings. The major themes or key characteristics of these landscape categories were: landform, foreground texture, color, landscape pattern, and sky pattern. For the majority of the participants, who had minimal familiarity with prairies, these themes or characteristics are important in allowing perception and understanding of prairie lands. This work reviews literature from diverse sources that support the positive relationship between familiarity and preference. It also suggests that new aesthetic assessment techniques may need to be developed for prairies and perhaps other open lands. These techniques should acknowledge and consider this relationship between familiarity and preference.en_US
dc.format.extent174 p.en_US
dc.subjectUrban and Regional Planningen_US
dc.titleThe role of familiarity in landscape aesthetics: A study of tallgrass prairie landscapes.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineLandscape Architectureen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/105214/1/9116215.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9116215.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.