Female investment strategies and reproductive success in the Uinta ground squirrel, Spermophilus armatus.
dc.contributor.author | Rieger, James Fair | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Myers, Philip | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Wrangham, Richard W. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-02-24T16:27:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-02-24T16:27:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1991 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | (UMI)AAI9124090 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9124090 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/105433 | |
dc.description.abstract | To understand the evolution of female investment strategies and social structure in ground squirrels, I studied the reproductive consequences of litter size and mass, the timing of reproduction, and social organization in the Uinta ground squirrel, Spermophilus armatus. Litter size and litter mass correlated positively with maternal body mass. Juvenile female survival varied positively with juvenile weaning weight and negatively with weaning date; mothers appeared to compensate for late weaning date by producing smaller litters containing heavier offspring. Juvenile survival did not vary with litter size, so larger litters produced more surviving yearlings. Thus, the "optimum litter size" exceeded the mean litter size. The iteroparity/longevity and the bad year hypotheses are probably not adequate explanations for this anomaly; the individual optimum hypothesis seems most appropriate. I studied the demographic cost of reproduction by experimentally removing litters early in lactation. Females with litters removed gained more weight before hibernation and emerged from hibernation the following spring heavier than if they had weaned litters, suggesting a capacity to wean larger litters subsequently. These females also hibernated earlier in the season than unmanipulated females, which probably improved their chances of survival by decreasing their exposure to predators. Removal of litters tended to increase the mothers' survival rates and subsequent litter sizes. Most females become permanently established as yearlings in burrow systems near their place of birth, creating "kin clusters" of related females. Individuals as closely related as siblings or grandmother/granddaughter treated each other preferentially. Increasing numbers of these relatives in a kin cluster accompanied poorer reproductive success even in this relatively asocial species, suggesting that a reproductive cost opposed kin clustering very early in ground squirrel social evolution. Close proximity of yearling daughters did not depress the reproductive success of their mothers. Yearlings that inherited a dead mother's burrow system had better reproductive success than yearlings that lived peripherally to a living mother or that emigrated to a new area, and peripheral yearlings tended to have better reproductive success than emigrants. Therefore, kin clustering appears to result from direct fitness benefits to yearlings and inclusive fitness benefits to their mothers. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 225 p. | en_US |
dc.subject | Biology, Ecology | en_US |
dc.subject | Biology, Zoology | en_US |
dc.title | Female investment strategies and reproductive success in the Uinta ground squirrel, Spermophilus armatus. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Biological Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/105433/1/9124090.pdf | |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of 9124090.pdf : Restricted to UM users only. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.