Show simple item record

Development of guidelines for the use of powered hand tools using psychophysical data.

dc.contributor.authorUlin, Sheryl Sueen_US
dc.contributor.advisorArmstrong, Thomas J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:28:04Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:28:04Z
dc.date.issued1991en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9124127en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9124127en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/105463
dc.description.abstractThis study was designed to investigate the relationship between perceived exertion during the use of powered hand tools and workplace variables such as work orientation, location, pace, and tool shape and mass. These findings can be used to design workstations and tools that minimize perceived stress on workers. Four laboratory studies were performed to investigate changes in perceived exertion for various screw driving tasks. Subjects drove number six hex head screws using air powered drivers into 18 gauge perforated sheet metal. Subjects drove screws at vertical work locations ranging from 38-191 cm, at horizontal work locations ranging from 13-88 cm, at 8, 10 and 12 screws per minute, with a pistol, in-line and right-angle driver, and using tools with a mass of 1, 2, and 3 kg. The Borg 10-point ratio rating scale was used to assess each work combination studied. In study 1, thirty-six subjects rated seven vertical and four horizontal locations (positioned at elbow height) after using pistol, right-angle and in-line tools. The tool and work location configurations with the lowest ratings of perceived exertion were at 114 cm on the vertical surface using a pistol shaped tool, and at 13-38 cm on the horizontal surface using the in-line or right-angle tools. Thirty subjects rated four horizontal locations after using pistol, right-angle and in-line tools for study 2. The horizontal beam was positioned vertically at mid-thigh, elbow and mid-chest height. The lowest ratings of perceived exertion occurred when using the pistol tool at mid-thigh height, and the in-line and right-angle tools at elbow and mid-chest height. For study 3, eighteen subjects drove screws with a pistol tool at three vertical locations (knee, elbow and shoulder height) and with an in-line tool at two horizontal locations (lower arm perpendicular to the torso and the arms fully extended) at three different work paces (8, 10 and 12 screws per minute). The lowest ratings of perceived exertion were at 8 screws per minute across all vertical and horizontal work locations. In study 4, eighteen subjects drove screws with a pistol tool at three vertical locations (64, 114, and 165 cm) and with an in-line tool at two horizontal locations (13 and 63 cm). Each tool varied in mass (1, 2 and 3 kg). For all vertical and horizontal work locations, the ratings of perceived exertion were significantly lower when a tool of mass 1 kg was used, and the ratings increased 18% to 100% with each 1 kg increase in tool mass. Physical stress as measured using perceived exertion varies significantly with work location, tool shape, work orientation, work pace and tool mass. These results provide a basis for selection of tool/workstation configurations that reduce perceived physical stress.en_US
dc.format.extent137 p.en_US
dc.subjectEngineering, Industrialen_US
dc.titleDevelopment of guidelines for the use of powered hand tools using psychophysical data.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineIndustrial and Operations Engineeringen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/105463/1/9124127.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9124127.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.