Show simple item record

Employee participation in reduction of ergonomic risk factors: Attitudes and perception of effects.

dc.contributor.authorOrta-Anes, Lidaen_US
dc.contributor.advisorLiker, Jeffrey K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:28:55Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:28:55Z
dc.date.issued1991en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9135665en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9135665en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/105584
dc.description.abstractEmployee acceptance of the introduction of ergonomics in their workplace is a critical factor in order for these innovations to be successful. Several research efforts have been directed to the study of employee participation (Coch and French Jr., 1948; French et al., 1960; among others). Fewer studies have been directed to the effects of participation in the introduction of ergonomic innovations (Joseph, 1986; Liker, Nagamachi and Lifshitz, 1988). Nevertheless, most of these studies have methodological limitations. This study tests the hypothesis that direct employee participation in the redesign of their jobs is inversely related to resistance to change as well as to perception of work related discomfort, and increases employee acceptance of these changes. A two wave quasi-experimental design was set-up in two engine assembly plants. One plant used the participative approach (P), the other plant did not include employee participation (NP). Survey research and participant observation methods were used to assess longitudinally employees' reactions to ergonomics changes to their jobs. The treatment sample sizes were 31 cases at plant P, and 18 at plant NP. Control groups were also set-up at each plant. The outcomes of the study were the following: (1) ergonomic applications are less likely to be openly resisted by workers when they participate in the process of job redesign; (2) objective participation is not directly related to perceptions of significant participation or positive evaluations of the change; and (3) perceived significant participation is related to positive evaluations of the change and reductions in perceived soreness. Nevertheless, performance outcomes show that both plants were effective in the implementation of ergonomic changes regardless of the participative approach, leading to positive employee reactions and reductions in perceived soreness. Also, no significant effect of participation was identified on organizational variables like QWL and trust in management. We conclude that employees' acceptance of ergonomic changes is critical, and participation increases the likelihood of more acceptable changes compatible with the way employees do their jobs. On the other hand, managers should not necessarily expect that employees will appreciate their greater participation in the change or that it will lead to more positive attitudes.en_US
dc.format.extent169 p.en_US
dc.subjectBusiness Administration, Managementen_US
dc.subjectEngineering, Industrialen_US
dc.subjectPsychology, Industrialen_US
dc.titleEmployee participation in reduction of ergonomic risk factors: Attitudes and perception of effects.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineUrban, Technological and Environmental Planning : Sociotechnological Planningen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/105584/1/9135665.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9135665.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.