Show simple item record

Business cycles and asset returns.

dc.contributor.authorTerry, Harold Andrewen_US
dc.contributor.advisorKaul, Gautamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:29:50Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:29:50Z
dc.date.issued1990en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9023653en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9023653en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/105721
dc.description.abstractThis research explores the relation between business cycles and financial asset returns. In particular, the effect of business cycles on stock returns and in the insurance rates of returns are explored. With respect to stock returns, a more general framework of analysis is described which relates stock returns, output and inflation to a set of exogenously given factors. Output and inflation are modeled as being jointly determined by a set of exogenous factors. These factors are found to affect stock returns in the same direction that they influence output. The major hypothesis test whether inflation has any effect on stock returns once exogenous factors have been controlled for. Tests were performed on annual data for both pre and post World War II years. Results of prewar tests were generally inconclusive, while results of the postwar tests strongly support this hypothesis. Cycles in property-casualty underwriting profits are different than the cycles in either gross national product or corporate profits as a whole. To examine the returns to insurance firms from underwriting, a simple pricing model for insurance is presented. The major implication is that in a rational expectations world where insurance firms use more than just the information available from past losses to set premiums, premiums should cause or predict losses. Causality test were used to explore this implication. Test results indicate that premiums do not cause or predict losses, but rather, that losses cause or predict premiums. Further tests were then performed to examine whether the market imperfection is an institutional aspect of the insurance industry, or rather the imperfection is a capital market imperfection, as one author argued. Test results indicate that the imperfection is not a capital market imperfection.en_US
dc.format.extent90 p.en_US
dc.subjectEconomics, Financeen_US
dc.titleBusiness cycles and asset returns.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineBusiness Administrationen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/105721/1/9023653.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9023653.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.