Show simple item record

Commitment in marriage: For better and for worse.

dc.contributor.authorOrtega, Robert Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.advisorVeroff, Josephen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:30:06Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:30:06Z
dc.date.issued1991en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9208619en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9208619en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/105758
dc.description.abstractThis study examined critical aspects of commitment in the context of the marriage relationship. Using 373 couples in their third year of marriage, three types of marital commitment (personal, interpersonal and social), and the relationship between these types and marital stability in the fourth year of marriage were examined. Commitment of a personal type reflected a willingness to remain in the relationship despite restrictive costs. Interpersonal commitment referred to thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of togetherness. Commitment of a social nature was indicated by perceptions of staying in marriage due to social network pressures and religious beliefs. Of primary interest was the extent to which individuals differed in each commitment type in terms of social demographic variables and marital processes thought to undermine commitment. Social demographic variables included gender, race, parental status and household income. Process variables were experiences of tension, problematic sexual relationships, family and friend interference, and inequity. Results indicate that social demographic variables are important predictors of commitment, although the three commitment types are not affected by demographic variables in exactly the same way. Negative process variables predicted each commitment type in the expected negative direction except for family interference and inequity which were positively related to interpersonal commitment. Regarding marital stability in the fourth year, interpersonal commitment was the strongest predictor of the three types. Collectively, this study indicates that important differences do occur for the three types of commitment suggesting that greater distinctions should be made in future research when referring to relationship commitment. Race and gender differences are also reported. Some clinical implications are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent119 p.en_US
dc.subjectPsychology, Socialen_US
dc.subjectSocial Worken_US
dc.titleCommitment in marriage: For better and for worse.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial Work and Psychologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/105758/1/9208619.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9208619.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.