BW 373U86: Behavioral pharmacology of a putative non-peptide, systemically-active delta opioid agonist.
dc.contributor.author | Comer, Sandra Dean | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Woods, James H. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-02-24T16:30:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-02-24T16:30:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1992 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | (UMI)AAI9226875 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9226875 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/105873 | |
dc.description.abstract | The experiments described in this thesis were designed to evaluate the opioid-receptor-mediation of the discriminative stimulus (S$\sp{\rm D}),$ analgesic and convulsant effects produced by BW 373U86 (($\pm$)-4-((R*)-$\alpha$-((2S*5R*)-4-Allyl-2,5-dimethyl-$ 1$-piperazinyl)-3-hydroxybenzyl)-N,N-diethylbenzamide dihydrochloride) using the apparent pA$\sb2$ method. Potencies were determined for the selective opioid antagonists, naltrindole (NTI) and naltrexone (NTX) in antagonizing morphine (MOR), bremazocine (BREM) and BW 373U86 (BW). The S$\sp{\rm D}$ effects of MOR, BREM and BW were established in separate groups of pigeons. None of the training drugs substituted for each other. With the exception of ethylketazocine, none of the compounds tested including the prototypic $\delta$ agonists substituted for BW. NTX was 30-fold more potent in antagonizing MOR than BW. NTI was 1000-fold more potent in antagonizing BW than MOR. NTI did not antagonize BREM. These data indicated that the S$\sp{\rm D}$ effects of MOR, BREM and BW were mediated through different receptors. Convulsant effects of BW were evaluated in mice. NTI was 10-fold more potent than NTX in antagonizing BW. None of the opioid compounds tested, including the prototypic $\delta$ agonists, produced a convulsive syndrome that was similar to BW-induced convulsions. Pretreatment with BW produced a dose-related downward shift in the BW dose-effect curve. The downward shift produced by pretreatment with 10.0 mg/kg BW did not return to baseline levels for 8 days. This downward shift was prevented by both NTI and NTX. The analgesic effects of MOR, BREM and BW were evaluated in the writhing assay in mice. NTX was more potent in antagonizing MOR than BW. NTI was more potent in antagonizing BW than MOR; NTI did not antagonize BREM. The analgesic effects of MOR, BREM and BW were most likely mediated through different receptors. The fact that the convulsant and S$\sp{\rm D}$ effects of BW were not shared with prototypic $\delta$ agonists suggested that BW may be producing its effects through a subtype of $\delta$ receptor. Support for this notion was also provided by the fact that the potency of NTI was different in antagonizing the analgesic effects of BW, (D-Ala2) deltorphin II and (D-Pen$\sp2,$D-Pen$\sp5$) enkephalin. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 152 p. | en_US |
dc.subject | Psychology, Psychobiology | en_US |
dc.subject | Health Sciences, Pharmacology | en_US |
dc.title | BW 373U86: Behavioral pharmacology of a putative non-peptide, systemically-active delta opioid agonist. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Psychology | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/105873/1/9226875.pdf | |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of 9226875.pdf : Restricted to UM users only. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.