Show simple item record

Local comparative advantage: Trade costs and the pattern of trade

dc.contributor.authorDeardorff, Alan V.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-05T18:19:02Z
dc.date.available2015-04-16T14:24:20Zen_US
dc.date.issued2014-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationDeardorff, Alan V. (2014). "Local comparative advantage: Trade costs and the pattern of trade." International Journal of Economic Theory 10(1): 9-35.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1742-7355en_US
dc.identifier.issn1742-7363en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106107
dc.description.abstractWhen there are costs of trade, such as transport or other costs, the pattern of trade may not be well described by the usual measures of comparative advantage, which simply compare a country's costs or autarky prices to those of the world. Instead, a better comparison takes into account the costs of trade. This paper shows first, in an example, how trade patterns can vary with costs of trade. It then provides restatements of the law of comparative advantage, first in a Ricardian model with trade costs, then extending a 1980 result due to Deardorff and to Dixit and Norman to include trade costs explicitly in a general framework. It uses this latter result to derive two correlations relating trade patterns to measures of comparative advantage that take account of both autarky prices and the costs of trade. Finally, the paper examines the solution to a trade model with product differentiation in order to make the potential role of trade costs more explicit, both algebraically and graphically. With product differentiation either by country or by firm, net trade in an industry, both bilaterally and globally, depends on a country's costs of both production and trade relative to an index of those costs for other countries.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherTransportation Costsen_US
dc.subject.otherComparative Advantageen_US
dc.subject.otherTrade Costsen_US
dc.titleLocal comparative advantage: Trade costs and the pattern of tradeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness and Economicsen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106107/1/ijet12025.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ijet.12025en_US
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Journal of Economic Theoryen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, R. W., and P. B. Kenen ( 1984 ), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: North‐Holland.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDebaere P. ( 1998 ), Endowments do matter: Relative factor abundance and trade, The Factor Proportions Theory of International Trade and Finance, unpublished dissertation, University of Michigan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDixit, A. K., and V. Norman ( 1980 ), Theory of International Trade, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDixit, A. K., and J. E. Stiglitz ( 1977 ), Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity, American Economic Review 67, 297 – 08.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDornbusch R., S. Fischer, and P. A. Samuelson ( 1977 ), Comparative advantage, trade, and payments in a Ricardian model with a continuum of goods, American Economic Review 67, 823 – 39.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEthier, W. J. ( 1984 ), Higher dimensional issues in trade theory, R. W. Jones and P. B. Kenen, eds, Handbook of International Economics, Vol. I, 131 – 84, Amsterdam: North‐Holland.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHakura D. ( 1995 ), A test of the general validity of the Heckscher–Ohlin theorem for trade in the European Community, Three Essays on the Effects of International Trade, unpublished dissertation, University of Michigan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelliwell, J. F. ( 1998 ), How Much Do National Borders Matter?, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelpman E., and P. R. Krugman ( 1985 ), Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHummels D. ( 2007 ), Transportation costs and international trade in the second era of globalization, Journal of Economic Perspectives 21, 131 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, R. W. ( 1961 ), Comparative advantage and the theory of tariffs: A multi‐country, multi‐commodity model, Review of Economic Studies 28, 161 – 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrugman, P. R. ( 1979 ), Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade, Journal of International Economics 9, 469 – 79.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCallum J. ( 1995 ), National borders matter: Canada‐U.S. regional trade patterns, American Economic Review 85, 615 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceObstfeld M., and K. Rogoff ( 2001 ), The six major puzzles in international macroeconomics: Is there a common cause? B. S. Bernanke and K. Rogoff, eds., NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, 339 – 390, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRauch, J. E. ( 2001 ), Business and social networks in international trade, Journal of Economic Literature 39, 1177 – 203.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSamuelson, P. A. ( 1952 ), The transfer problem and transport costs, Economic Journal 62, 278 – 304.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrefler D. ( 1995 ), The case of the missing trade and other mysteries, American Economic Review 85, 1029 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, J. E. ( 1979 ), A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation, American Economic Review 69, 106 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, J. E., and E. van Wincoop ( 2003 ), Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle, American Economic Review 93, 170 – 92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArmington, P. S. ( 1969 ), A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production, IMF Staff Papers 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBergstrand, J. H. ( 1985 ), The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence, Review of Economics and Statistics 67, 474 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBergstrand, J. H. ( 1989 ), The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor‐proportions theory in international trade, Review of Economics and Statistics 71, 143 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBowen, H. P., E. E. Leamer, and L. Sveikauskas ( 1987 ), Multicountry, multifactor tests of the factor abundance theory, American Economic Review 77, 599 – 620.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, D. R., and D. E. Weinstein ( 2001 ), An account of global factor trade, American Economic Review 91, 1423 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeardorff, A. V. ( 1980 ), The general validity of the law of comparative advantage, Journal of Political Economy 88, 941 – 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeardorff, A. V. ( 1982 ), The general validity of the Heckscher‐Ohlin theorem, American Economic Review 72, 683 – 94.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeardorff, A. V. ( 1998 ), Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world? J. Frankel, ed., The Regionalization of the World Economy, 7 – 28, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeardorff, A. V. ( 2001 ), Trade and welfare implications of networks, Journal of Economic Integration 16, 485 – 99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeardorff, A. V. ( 2003 ), Sources and implications of comparative advantage, Ohlin Lectures, Stockholm School of Economics, November.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.