Show simple item record

An Integrative Framework for the Analysis of Multiple and Multimodal Representations for Meaning‐Making in Science Education

dc.contributor.authorTang, Kok‐singen_US
dc.contributor.authorDelgado, Cesaren_US
dc.contributor.authorMoje, Elizabeth Birren_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-05T18:19:15Z
dc.date.available2015-04-16T14:24:20Zen_US
dc.date.issued2014-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationTang, Kok‐sing ; Delgado, Cesar ; Moje, Elizabeth Birr (2014). "An Integrative Framework for the Analysis of Multiple and Multimodal Representations for Meaningâ Making in Science Education." Science Education 98(2): 305-326.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0036-8326en_US
dc.identifier.issn1098-237Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106155
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an integrative framework for analyzing science meaning‐making with representations. It integrates the research on multiple representations and multimodal representations by identifying and leveraging the differences in their units of analysis in two dimensions: timescale and compositional grain size. Timescale considers the duration of time a learner typically spends on one or more representations. Compositional grain size refers to the elements of interest within a representation, ranging from components such as visual elements, words, or symbols, to a representation as a whole. Research on multiple representations focuses on the practice of re‐representing science concepts through different representations and is typically of long timescale and large grain size. Research on multimodal representations tends to consider how learners integrate the components of a representation to produce meaning; it is usually of finer grain size and shorter timescale. In the integrative framework, each type of analysis on multiple and multimodal representations plays a mutually complementary role in illuminating students’ learning with representations. The framework is illustrated through the analysis of instructional episodes of middle school students using representations to learn nanoscience concepts over the course of a lesson unit. Finally, recommendations for new research directions stemming from this framework are presented.en_US
dc.publisherEquinoxen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleAn Integrative Framework for the Analysis of Multiple and Multimodal Representations for Meaning‐Making in Science Educationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106155/1/sce21099.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sce.21099en_US
dc.identifier.sourceScience Educationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrain, V., & Waldrip, B. ( 2006 ). An exploratory study of teachers’ and students’ use of multi‐modal representations of concepts in primary science. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1843 – 1866.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemke, J. L. ( 1990 ). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemke, J. L. ( 1998 ). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science (pp. 87 – 113 ). London: Routledge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemke, J. L. ( 2000 ). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture and Activity, 7 ( 4 ), 273 – 290.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMárquez, C., Izquierdo, M., & Espinet, M. ( 2006 ). Multimodal science teachers’ discourse in modeling the water cycle. Science Education, 90, 202 – 226.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMayer, R. E. ( 2001 ). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNeill, D. ( 2005 ). Gesture and thought. London: University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePozzer‐Ardenghi, L., & Roth, W. M. ( 2007 ). On performing concepts during science lectures. Science Education, 91, 96 – 114.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrain, V., Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. ( 2009 ). Multiple representation in learning about evaporation. International Journal of Science Education, 31 ( 6 ), 787 – 808.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosengrant, D., Etkina, E., & Van Heuvelen, A. ( 2007 ). An overview of recent research on multiple representations. AIP Conference Proceedings, 883 ( 1 ), 149 – 152.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoth, W.‐M., & Tobin, K. ( 1997 ). Cascades of inscriptions and the re‐presentation of nature: How numbers, tables, graphs, and money come to re‐present a rolling ball. International Journal of Science Education, 19 ( 9 ), 1075 – 1091.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchnotz, W., & Bannert, M. ( 2003 ). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13, 141 – 156.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTang, K.‐S., & Moje, E. ( 2010 ). Relating multimodal representations to the literacies of science. Research in Science Education, 40, 81 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTang, K.‐S., Tan, S. C., & Yeo, J. ( 2011 ). Students’ multimodal construction of work‐energy concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1775 – 1804.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVygotsky, L. ( 1986 ). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaldrip, B., Prain, V., & Carolan, J. ( 2010 ). Using multi‐modal representations to improve learning in junior secondary science. Research in Science Education, 40, 65 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYore, L. D. & Hand, B. ( 2010 ). Epilogue: Plotting a research agenda for multiple representations, multiple modality, and multimodal representational competency. Research in Science Education, 40, 93 – 101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F. ( 2006 ). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy—empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 291 – 314.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAinsworth, S. ( 2006 ). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16 ( 3 ), 183 – 198.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAinsworth, S., Bibby, P., & Wood, D. ( 2002 ). Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11 ( 1 ), 25 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAirey, J., & Linder, C. ( 2009 ). A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 27 – 49en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. ( 2006 ). Multimodal transcription and text analysis. London: Equinox.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBransford, J. D. ( 2000 ). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChandler, P., & Sweller, J. ( 1996 ), Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 151 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFredlund, T., Airey, J., & Linder, C. ( 2012 ). Exploring the role of physics representations: An illustrative example from students sharing knowledge about refraction. European Journal of Physics, 33, 657 – 666.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (Eds.). ( 2009 ). Multiple representations in chemical education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalliday, M. A. K. ( 1978 ). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalliday, M. A. K. ( 1994 ). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHand, B., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J., Guzzetti, B. J., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., et al. ( 2003 ). Message from the “Island group”: What is literacy in science literacy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 607 – 615.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHand, B., Gunel, M., & Ulu, C. ( 2009 ). Sequencing embedded multimodal representations in a writing to learn approach to the teaching of electricity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 ( 3 ), 225 – 247.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHubber, P., Tytler, R., & Haslam, F. ( 2010 ). Teaching and learning about force with a representational focus: Pedagogy and teacher change. Research in Science Education, 40, 5 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJaipal, K. ( 2009 ). Meaning making through multiple modalities in a biology classroom: A multimodal semiotics discourse analysis. Science Education, 94, 48 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKozma, R. ( 2003 ). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13, 205 – 226en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. ( 2000 ). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9 ( 2 ), 105 – 143.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. C. ( 2006 ). Project‐based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317 – 334 ). New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. ( 2001 ). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. ( 2006 ). Reading images: The grammar of visual design ( 2nd ed. ). London: Routledge.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.