Show simple item record

Use of spanking for 3 year-old children and associated intimate partner aggression or violence

dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorLee, Shawna
dc.contributor.authorGuterman, Neil
dc.contributor.authorRice, Janet
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-08T18:18:14Z
dc.date.available2014-03-08T18:18:14Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationTaylor, C A, Lee, S J, Guterman, N B, & Rice, J. (2010). Use of spanking for 3 year-old children and associated intimate partner aggression or violence. Pediatrics, 126(3), 415-424. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106170>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106170
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine associations between maternal and paternal use of corporal punishment (CP) for 3-year-old children and intimate partner aggression or violence (IPAV) in a population-based sample. METHODS: The study sample (N 1997) was derived from wave 3 of the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study. Mother and father reports regarding their use of CP and their IPAV victimization were analyzed. IPAV included coercion and nonphysical and physical aggression. RESULTS: Approximately 65% of the children were spanked at least once in the previous month by 1 or both parents. Of couples who reported any family aggression (87%), 54% reported that both CP and IPAV occurred. The most prevalent patterns of co-occurrence involved both parents as aggressors either toward each other (ie, bilateral IPAV) or toward the child. The presence of bilateral IPAV essentially doubled the odds that 1 or both parents would use CP, even after controlling for potential confounders such as parenting stress, depression, and alcohol or other drug use. Of the 5 patterns of cooccurring family aggression assessed, the “single aggressor” model, in which only 1 parent aggressed in the family, received the least amount of empirical support. CONCLUSIONS: Despite American Academy of Pediatrics’ recommendations against the use of CP, CP use remains common in the United States. CP prevention efforts should carefully consider assumptions made about patterns of co-occurring aggression in families, given that adult victims of IPAV, including even minor, nonphysical aggression between parents, have increased odds of using CP with their children.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectCorporal Punishment, Physical Punishment, Spank, Parenting, Domestic Violence, Intimate Partner Aggression or Violence, Toddlers, Epidemiology, Fragile Families, Parent-to-Child Conflict Tactics Scale, CTSPC, Physical Disciplineen_US
dc.titleUse of spanking for 3 year-old children and associated intimate partner aggression or violenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Sciences (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan School of Social Worken_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Institute for Social Researchen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Chicago, Tulane Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106170/1/2010-Taylor-Lee-Guterman-Rice-PEDS.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1542/peds.2010-0314
dc.identifier.sourcePediatricsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInstitute for Social Research (ISR)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.