Show simple item record

Risk factors for paternal physical child abuse

dc.contributor.authorLee, Shawna
dc.contributor.authorGuterman, Neil
dc.contributor.authorLee, Yookyong
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-08T18:55:47Z
dc.date.available2014-03-08T18:55:47Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationLee, S J, Guterman, N B, & Lee, Y. (2008). Risk factors for paternal physical child abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 846-858. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106176>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106176
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study uses the developmental–ecological framework to examine a comprehensive set of paternal factors hypothesized to be linked to risk for paternal child abuse (PCA) among a diverse sample of fathers. Attention was given to fathers’ marital status and their race/ethnicity (White, African American, and Hispanic). Methods: Interviews were conducted with 1257 married or cohabiting biological fathers who participated in the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study. PCA was assessed when the index childrenwere 3 years old. Analyses included a comprehensive set of self-reported paternal variables as well as controls for maternal variables linked to child maltreatment. PCA was measured using proxy variables: two questions assessing the frequency of spanking in the past month and Parent–Child Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS-PC) [Straus, M., Hamby, S., Finkelhor, D., Moore, D., & Runyan, D. (1998). Identification of child maltreatment with the parent-child conflict tactics scales: Development and psychometric data for a national sample of American parents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 249–270] psychological and physical aggression subscales. Results: Bivariate results indicated that Hispanic fathers were the least likely to spank or engage in psychological or physical aggression. Multiple regression analyses indicated that paternal employment and earnings were not significantly associated with PCA. Compared to cohabiting African American fathers, married African American fathers were found to be at greater risk for some forms of PCA. This pattern was not found for White or Hispanic families. Conclusions: In this diverse sample of involved, biological fathers, there appear to be multiple potential risk-heightening pathways that vary across race/ethnic groups. With the proper control variables, paternal employment and earnings may not be as directly linked to fathers’ physical abuse risk as has been previously thought. Practice implications: There is a need for interventions within the child welfare system that better promote family wellbeing by including fathers in services. Patterns linking paternal socio-demographic and psychosocial factors to psychological and physical child abuse varied as a function of paternal race/ethnicity, indicating that race/ethnic differences are among the important factors that intervention efforts should take into account.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectFathersen_US
dc.subjectFatheringen_US
dc.subjectFather-child Relationshipen_US
dc.subjectParentingen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Child Abuseen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Disciplineen_US
dc.subjectSpankingen_US
dc.subjectCorporal Punishmenten_US
dc.subjectFragile Families and Child Wellbeing Studyen_US
dc.subjectChild Welfareen_US
dc.subjectChild Protective Servicesen_US
dc.titleRisk factors for paternal physical child abuseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Sciences (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan School of Social Worken_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Institute for Social Researchen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106176/1/2008-lee-guterman-lee-CAN.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.11.006
dc.identifier.sourceChild Abuse & Neglecten_US
dc.owningcollnameInstitute for Social Research (ISR)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.