Describing Cognitive Orientation of Calculus I Tasks Across Different Types of Coursework
dc.contributor.author | White, Nina | |
dc.contributor.author | Mesa, Vilma | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-03-10T02:58:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-03-10T02:58:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-03-09 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106183 | |
dc.description.abstract | We discuss the findings of an analysis of cognitive orientation of 4,953 mathematical tasks (representing all bookwork, worksheets, and exams) used by five instructors teaching Calculus I in a two-year college in the United States over a one-semester period. This study uses data from one of 18 cases from the Characteristics of Successful Programs in College Calculus (CSPCC) and characterizes the tasks using and adaptation of an analytical framework developed by Tallman & Carlson (2012). We found differences in the cognitive orientation by type of course work assigned (graded vs. ungraded) and differences by the instructors who assigned the course work. We discuss implications for practice and propose some areas for further exploration. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Mathematical Association of America | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Science Foundation | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Cognitive Orientation of Mathematical Tasks, Assessment, Calculus I, Student Coursework, Graded Coursework, Ungraded Coursework, Textbook | en_US |
dc.title | Describing Cognitive Orientation of Calculus I Tasks Across Different Types of Coursework | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Education | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Education, School of | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Mathematics, Department of | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106183/1/ZDM_WhiteMesa_CalculusTasks_Resubmission_Final.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Education, School of |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.